Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkie2
I make no comment on "solar power". Perhaps this installation will be an honest assessment of the technology. Perhaps not.

After all, there are no political axes to grind, oh, no!.

The Stirling cycle engine very recently has become a viable automotive engine. An English group claims 80% thermal efficiency in their automotive design. They say they have the weight, size, and cost under control. This is probably wishful thinking. If it is all true, though, it means that Prius sized cars can triple their fuel economy.

Also a Stirling can burn anything - liquid, solid, or gas - if designed and built for exotic fuels.

This is the last unexploited technology available for use. Conservation and nuclear is the only way left to cut fossil energy use further. After the Sterling car engine no "three times more efficient" technology is within sight.

Satellite solar power, if people want to do it. Big job.

9 posted on 08/13/2005 4:12:00 AM PDT by Iris7 ("A pig's gotta fly." - Porco Rosso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Iris7
Satellite solar power, if people want to do it.

Nuke-a-bird technology?

10 posted on 08/13/2005 4:20:41 AM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Iris7

I'm more interested in the use of the stirling engine here than the solar power aspect. The stirling is just so damn efficient it's a shame it's not used in more applications.


12 posted on 08/13/2005 4:26:44 AM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Iris7

I am for any generation that will generate during the peak hours. Here in Texas with the wind generation the wind blowing at night during the off peak hours, I am up to my chin with excess generation and know where to put it.


13 posted on 08/13/2005 4:28:21 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (shoot low, they are riding Shetlands.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Iris7

Yes and no. Solar power satellite in earth orbit, or on the moon simply aren't profitable at today's launch and electricity prices. What is needed is an NSO SPS-statite-receiving station system. An SPS is placed in a near solar orbit of (preferrably) around 10 million km from the sun. The solar energy is converted to microwave which is beamed to a statite in polar orbit. The polar statite in turn beams the energy down to receiving stations along the hemisphere.

The increased solar flux makes the entire venture profitable, even if electricity is only sold for 1/10th of a cent/kWh (IIRC).


23 posted on 08/13/2005 6:08:07 AM PDT by Edward Watson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Iris7

" This is the last unexploited technology available for use."

Guess we'ed better shut down the patent office again.


31 posted on 08/13/2005 7:26:26 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Iris7

GOOD job; Solar power satellites...IF people 'want' to do it.

Which they havent for 30 years.

Gee I thought AMERICANS weren't afraid to 'think big'...or did that end with Apollo? -sigh-

SPACE is the RIGHT place for solar.


95 posted on 08/13/2005 8:11:35 PM PDT by FYREDEUS (FYREDEUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Iris7
The Stirling cycle engine very recently has become a viable automotive engine.

Would you please provide a link for that statement? To the best of my knowledge, Stirlings don't replace Otto cycle engines in automotive applications because they take longer to start, run at much higher RPMs, are bulkier and aren't suited to the variable power that automobiles demand.

A power plant, however, seems like a made-to-order application for Stirling engines.

114 posted on 08/14/2005 8:12:51 AM PDT by Doohickey (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Iris7
Solar Power Satellite Forum
123 posted on 08/14/2005 9:37:57 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson