Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cindy Sheehan Photo Worth 1,000 Words
Mattfoto.com ^ | August 12, 2005 | N/A

Posted on 08/12/2005 12:22:52 PM PDT by Sam Hill

The image “http://www.mattfoto.com/blog/images/war.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cindysheehan; herfreedomcamefrom; itsallprettysick; leftwingscum; michaelmoore; mooreslateststunt; nutjobsarevoterstoo; sheehan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-256 next last
To: atlaw

"You have posted a photograph a mother with an expression of grief for her lost son. You have invited others to mock her, to engage in despicable laughter at only her loss. Nothing else. Not her opinons. Not her actions. Just make fun of her grief."

As I've already mentioned, here are a few of the threads I have posted about Cindy Sheehan. Her opinions. Her actions.

Cindy Sheehan -- In Her Own Words
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461469/posts

Cindy Sheehan: "My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1460787/posts

Some Facts About Cindy Sheehan's Son, Casey
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1462042/posts

Cindy Sheehan & Friends -- Paid George Soros Stooges?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461681/posts

Cindy Sheehan's Partner - Nadia McCaffrey - Attempted Suicide Twice
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461624/posts

'Peace Advocate' Cindy Sheehan: "Our Country Has Been Taken Over By Murderous Thugs"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1458449/posts

And I have posted on dozens of other threads with more substantial information about her and her pals.

What have you done? Except act self-righteous about my posting a photo of her?

You are a pompous blowhard. Go back to DU.


121 posted on 08/12/2005 4:21:11 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

Comment #122 Removed by Moderator

To: atlaw

"You have posted a photograph a mother with an expression of grief for her lost son. You have invited others to mock her, to engage in despicable laughter at only her loss."

Did you even notice the person behind her? Which was the reason for posting the photo?

I provided a caption in my first reply.

Or were you blinded by the chance to be self-righteous?

Better luck next time. LOL


123 posted on 08/12/2005 4:23:36 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

"You are either lying or stupid."

Or a DU/Moby troll. (Which doesn't rule out the other choices, of course.)


124 posted on 08/12/2005 4:24:56 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

I actually asked that post of mine get removed...need to evaluate a bit more before jumping to that conclusion. Although clearly the person needs to be pay a bit more attention if neither of those descriptions were correct.


125 posted on 08/12/2005 4:27:50 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Well, in that regard you're a better man than he is.


126 posted on 08/12/2005 4:30:00 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
Frankly, you are a perfect disservice to those who would point out the error of her opinions. I can only hope that you are in the minority. Should this kind of unmitigated nastiness make it into the MSM (which has been known to happen) FR will be painted in a very poor light, to put it mildly.
127 posted on 08/12/2005 4:41:38 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
Here she seems perfectly happy to have a son on the Army:


128 posted on 08/12/2005 4:43:46 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
Just make fun of her grief.

Grief? I detect more glee coming from Sheehan than I do grief.

129 posted on 08/12/2005 4:46:25 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
I think the "S" on his cap means "Sandwich."

No, it designates the type of sandwich he is eating...

130 posted on 08/12/2005 4:46:49 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
Frankly, you are a perfect disservice to those who would point out the error of her opinions. I can only hope that you are in the minority. Should this kind of unmitigated nastiness make it into the MSM (which has been known to happen) FR will be painted in a very poor light, to put it mildly.

I'm guessing you're insane. I have posted nothing that could conceivably be called "unmitigated nastiness." But if that is your cup of tea, behold some of Cindy Sheehan's words. (Don't worry, the MSM will never post them):

Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. Am I stupid? No, I know full-well that my son, my family, this nation, and this world were betrayed by a George Bush who was influenced by the neo-con PNAC agenda after 9/11.

http://tinyurl.com/8jcbw

[M]y first born was killed violently for a neo-con agenda that only benefits a very chosen few in this world.

http://tinyurl.com/avwer

You get America out of Iraq and Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism," she exclaimed."

http://electroniciraq.net/news/printer2098.shtml

Could my son be dead because of an evil-neo con Pax Americana agenda?

We began the killing as soon as we stepped foot on these shores and the killing has gone on unabated for over 200 years.

There has always been excuses for wars, but NONE of them have been good or valid.  

http://tinyurl.com/7rzr3

George Bush and his neo-conservatives killed my son,” she said tearing up a bit. “America has been killing people on this continent since it was started. This country is not worth dying for.”

The biggest terrorist is George W. Bush.

9/11 was Pearl Harbor for the neo-conservatives’ agenda.

"The U.S. government a “morally repugnant system.”

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=17915

Our country has been overtaken by murderous thugs....gangsters who lust after fortunes and power; never caring that their addictions are at the expense of our loved ones, and the blood of innocent people near and far. We've watched these thugs parade themselves before the whole world as if they are courageous advocates for Christian moral values....and for the spread of democracy.

[T]he US government is now ruled by murderous hypocrites... criminals who should be arrested, charged appropriately, confined behind bars...

In their secret hiding places, while celebrating newly won fortunes with their fellow brass, these men must surely congratulate themselves with orgies of carnal pleasure as they mock the dwindling multitudes who are yet so blind as to mistake them for God's devoted servants. 

131 posted on 08/12/2005 5:00:32 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
You have posted a photograph a mother with an expression of grief for her lost son. You have invited others to mock her, to engage in despicable laughter at only her loss.

That isn't true at all - obvious to anyone with the ability to see and read English. He posted a photo of her with Michael Moore (you know who that is, don't you?) at a celebration for the trash called "Farenheit 9/11" - a documentary of confirmed lies.

Nothing else. Not her opinons. Not her actions.

That's false. He has posted numerous opinions of her - such as her "get rid of Israel" comments, and her "Bush stole the election" comments. This picture and this thread are no exception - appearing at a Michael Moore / Fahrenheit 9/11 celebration are an action of hers.

Just make fun of her grief. That's what you have facilitated. And others have joined you, though thankfully not too many.

Another false claim, obvious from reading the comments and the original post.

This serves no purpose whatsoever. It does not rebut the opinions she has expressed or the actions she has taken. Indeed, it is perfectly counter-productive. To those who may be persuaded that her's is not a justifiable position, you have offered only ammunition to dismiss such opinions as the rantings of bloodless delinquents.

Showing her alliance with Michael Moore and his hate group serves a great purpose - it just further confirms her true agenda. However, your efforts to confuse those who may be lurking as to what this thread are about cast a huge cloud over your true motives for posting on this forum.

132 posted on 08/12/2005 5:13:57 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

before the grammar police get me - yes, I know...that "are" should be "is."


133 posted on 08/12/2005 5:16:45 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
Frankly, you are a perfect disservice to those who would point out the error of her opinions. I can only hope that you are in the minority. Should this kind of unmitigated nastiness make it into the MSM (which has been known to happen) FR will be painted in a very poor light, to put it mildly.

I looked over the posts - I can't find a single one making fun of her "grief" as you have stated - let alone a "facilitation". You made this up. Every comment is directed toward the fact this photo demonstrates her alliance with Michael Moore - and indeed, a great deal of the comments are about Michael Moore and don't even mention Sheehan.

134 posted on 08/12/2005 5:20:49 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Thanks. Well put.


135 posted on 08/12/2005 5:21:40 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
“America has been killing people on this continent since it was started. This country is not worth dying for.”

Fox just showed an ad by her being run on Crawford cable systems where she claims to "Love this country" and she just wants President Bush to admit his mistakes. Why does anyone in their right mind give her credibility?

136 posted on 08/12/2005 5:22:40 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

"Fox just showed an ad by her being run on Crawford cable systems where she claims to "Love this country" and she just wants President Bush to admit his mistakes. Why does anyone in their right mind give her credibility?"

She is saying what the MSM want said--doesn't matter if she is lying. They don't care.

Fox is just lazy and stupid. They hardly have any reporters. The ones they have don't seem to know how to use the internet or Lexis-Nexis.


137 posted on 08/12/2005 5:33:01 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Oh yeah, junior. I definitely have alternative motives for posting on this forum. And for four years, I've cleverly hidden those motives.

My guess is not a single one of you juvenile delinquents is old enough to have lost someone in a war, and that not a single one of the piling on blowhards on this thread have participated in a war.

I don't give a good dam who's standing behind her. You don't mock the grief of a soldier's mother. Period. You forgive, disagree, and act respectful. Unless, of course, you are an internet general, full of phony piss and vinegar, and bloated with the potato chips that are undoubtedly sitting in your lap.

She's wrong. But she's also in the U.S., and she's lost a son in battle, and that entitles her to be wrong in spades. Disagree? Fine. Act like a pack of drooling hyenas? Take it somewhere else, ace.


138 posted on 08/12/2005 5:58:54 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

Other than you are not looking, No.


139 posted on 08/12/2005 6:05:09 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

"I definitely have alternative motives for posting on this forum. And for four years, I've cleverly hidden those motives."

Not really.

Judging from your past posts (found via your homepage and "in forum" file), you motive for posting is to demonstrate your superiority to the other mere mortals here.

You seem to be quite the expert on everything from the military, evolution, the police, the law--you name it.

I for one am very impressed. (Just kidding. You really are an insufferable ass.)


140 posted on 08/12/2005 6:22:57 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson