Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FReethesheeples; doug from upland; Dog; dead; Howlin; Buckhead

Right now the 9/11 Commission members are claiming that they didn't believe the two intel officers about Able Danger identifying 4 of the 9/11/01 hijackers in 1999 and 2000.

The article for this thread demonstrates that the 9/11 Commission was ALSO told by Clarke himself in public testimony about the FBI identifying two of those hijackers prior to 9/11/01.

So the 9/11 commission is attempting to claim that its most trusted Clintonite, Richard Clarke, and the two U.S. intel officers, were all untrustworthy as to their claims about some of Al Qaeda's 9/11 cell being identified prior to 9/11.

That dog won't hunt.

The 9/11 Commission knew.

No fewer than 3 credible government employees told the 9/11 Commission about identifying the hijackers prior to 9/11.

The 9/11 Commission spiked those facts.

42 posted on 08/13/2005 12:32:05 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
The article for this thread demonstrates that the 9/11 Commission was ALSO told by Clarke himself in public testimony about the FBI identifying two of those hijackers prior to 9/11/01.

That's is most interesting and important. They want to discount the witnesses AND clark - uh, connect the dots, people! They just plain decided to bury it.

46 posted on 08/13/2005 1:23:14 PM PDT by turbocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson