Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheMole

I did some US Census lookups.

In 2000, the 25 liberal cities had a combined population of 20,056,925. The 25 conservative cities had a combined population of 4,732,782.

In 2004, the 25 liberal cities had a combined population of 19,897,172 -- a drop of nearly 160,000 people, or 0.8%. By contrast the 25 conservative cities had a combined population of 5,059,288 -- growing by 326,706, or 6.5% in 4 years. This is a growth pace 50% higher than the national rate of 4.3%.

Together, the 25 conservative cities made a net gain of nearly half a million people against the 25 liberal cities in only 4 years. That's almost an entire congressional district in a single presidential election cycle, from a small list of cities.

If you believe that demography is destiny, the point is obvious: long term, liberals are screwed.


203 posted on 08/11/2005 5:24:30 PM PDT by IowaHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IowaHawk

Excellent bit of research.

Just guesstimating but I betcha that most of the liberal cities on this list are near or in bankruptcy as well.


214 posted on 08/11/2005 6:52:27 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson