Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rdb3
Thats a good point. If there was an exchange of money for service then he was legally and contractually bound to provide all services that any other paying guests would receive.
93 posted on 08/11/2005 2:06:22 PM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Mulch
If there was an exchange of money for service then he was legally and contractually bound to provide all services that any other paying guests would receive.

And since this was the case, the race issue is a sideshow. What we have here is a clear breach of contract, unless that contract specifically denied these family members access to the pool. I highly doubt that it did.

Private property rights is also a sideshow. It's a clear breach of contract. No matter where one comes down on race, this is a bad business practice. That should be vociferously condemned by all of us.


94 posted on 08/11/2005 2:19:49 PM PDT by rdb3 (With my own Purple Haze, Jimi Hendrix never sounded so good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson