Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Boxer threatens to slow Senate activity over court pick.
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 8/11/05 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 08/11/2005 11:04:26 AM PDT by Crackingham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: tazannie
I know you are right. what I cannot get my head around is why? is it really all about the money? what benefit do they get from murdering babies?

Think 1960's like they do - they reserve the 'right' to kill their mistakes if they get high and get knocked up. They reserve the 'right' to kill, rather than take on the responsibility of a life. Life's just a big pot party, and war protest, and the sex is free in their warped world.

41 posted on 08/11/2005 11:26:05 AM PDT by GaltMeister (“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

It's all about (killing) the children.


42 posted on 08/11/2005 11:26:14 AM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GaltMeister
slow Senate business to a crawl if he doesn't answer her questions.
IOW, she will throw a spoiled-brat hissy fit if she dosen't get her way, despite what the President and majority of Congress want.
What a pathetic excuse of a 'leader'.

I used to be ashamed of Having this ***** as one of my senators, but now I realize that people are leaving the Democratic party in droves because of her.

Go Boxer.

43 posted on 08/11/2005 11:26:47 AM PDT by oldbrowser (You lost the election.........get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

She's stupid.

No nominee will or should say exactly how they will rule on cases. That prejudices[get it?]the law.

She should know that.
Oh, I know she does and this is all loudmouth theater.

But her dumber minions eat this crapola up. They must...she keeps getting re-elected.


44 posted on 08/11/2005 11:32:25 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Damn everything else in the Constitution, just protect abortion.

Abortion is the only issue that Senator "Babs The Red Diaper Baby" Boxer, ever runs on, besides her mouth.

45 posted on 08/11/2005 11:38:18 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Doesn't this "lady" know, that the Constitution does not guarantee a "right to privacy" ?


46 posted on 08/11/2005 11:39:13 AM PDT by jeffDavis1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Sen. Barbara Boxer said Wednesday she will vote against Supreme Court nominee John Roberts unless he supports rights she considers essential - - including abortion and privacy -- and slow Senate business to a crawl if he doesn't answer her questions.

A recess appointment of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court while the Senate slows to a crawl should speed things up!

47 posted on 08/11/2005 11:42:37 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Blah, blah, blah -- just more Boxer-speak -- Got Botox, Babs?


48 posted on 08/11/2005 11:43:35 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

"I need to know if he will fight to protect and defend the rights and freedoms of the American people"

That's not his job, it's yours. When are you going to start? Like say, fighting to make sure we're not killed by terrorists in our homeland? Hmmmm, Babs?


49 posted on 08/11/2005 11:44:10 AM PDT by republicofdavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
I used to be ashamed of Having this ***** as one of my senators, but now I realize that people are leaving the Democratic party in droves because of her.

Hey if you didn't vote for her you should not have to feel shame, I'm in CA and my main feelings about "box-of-rocks [dumb as]" Boxer are REVULSION, LOL.

50 posted on 08/11/2005 11:45:35 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tazannie
what I cannot get my head around is why? is it really all about the money? what benefit do they get from murdering babies?

They have several goals.

First is to free women from the consquences of our actions, making us less responsible and thoughtful about what we do, hence less adult.

Second is to decrease the value we place on life. Inconvenient people such as unwanted babies, severely mentally retarded or mentally injured people (think Terri Schiavo), elderly people who can no longer make decisions for themselves (dementia or Alzheimer's victims, for example), etc., are all targets for abortion or having the feeding tube pulled or withholding medical care.

Third, by cheapening life they can weaken the argument that we are the children of God, responsible to Him for the way we lead our lives, therefore decreasing the moral principles and context which give our lives structure and meaning.

Fourth, by cheapening life they increase the possibility of human embryos being created for the purpose of harvesting stem cells. It also raises the specter of human beings being grown for use as organ donors.

The Liberals have lots of jolly plans for us in the future. And once they've established that human life is not divinely inspired and worthy of protection, on what basis will we be able to fight them?

51 posted on 08/11/2005 11:47:50 AM PDT by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Somebody please remind her that there is a war going on.

Her pet political issues cannot be allowed to dominate the government's business.


52 posted on 08/11/2005 11:49:01 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

She knows the MSM is ginning up 'tempest in a teapot' scandals and time is on her side. Even a recent Drudge headline queried 'any more surprises from Roberts?' What surprises? The only criticisms that have come close to problematic has been that Roberts has had CLIENTS with views the left doesn't like. Lawyers aren't required to share their clients' philosophies or propenities, any more than a lawyer who defends a killer has to be one. It doesn't matter if there are legitimate concerns about Roberts' qualifications if the public perceives that there are, and the MSM is working diligently on creating that perception.


53 posted on 08/11/2005 11:49:06 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder
She's stupid.

I agree. It's too bad we don't have a law to impeach certifiably stupid people from Congress! We could get rid of Boxer and many more of her ilk. She has no interest in the Constitution or law - only her selfish and stupid agenda.

54 posted on 08/11/2005 11:50:28 AM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

BOXER/Hillary in '08!

The two smartest women in the world...


55 posted on 08/11/2005 11:51:13 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tazannie
I know you are right. what I cannot get my head around is why? is it really all about the money? what benefit do they get from murdering babies?

In the ancient times, the Canaanites and Phoenicians would sacrifice babies to Baal, burning them in a fiery furnace. It was a sacrament to their fervently held beliefs, a ritual to invoke power.

Now, the furnace is in the basement of the abortuaries.

56 posted on 08/11/2005 11:53:00 AM PDT by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: konaice

They should be forever known as the Gang of Fourteen Fools


57 posted on 08/11/2005 11:53:33 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jeffDavis1861

So you are not aware of the Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Third amendment or First amendment? Read them some time.


58 posted on 08/11/2005 11:54:18 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GaltMeister
I know you are right. what I cannot get my head around is why? is it really all about the money? what benefit do they get from murdering babies?

less minorities in the gene pool. Remember Planned Parenthood's original name, the American Eugenics Society was only changed after the rise of Hitler.
59 posted on 08/11/2005 11:57:40 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

Go BOXER/Hillary in '08!


60 posted on 08/11/2005 11:58:41 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson