To: holdonnow
Do you think the 9-ll Commission, or the MSM, will ever castigate Reno's Justice Dept, Jamie Gorelick specifically, for creating "the wall"? (Castigate? Hellsbells, I'd appreciate a wrist slap at this point.)
Will we ever know why "the wall" was created?
Am I stupid for thinking Sandy Berger's heist at the National Archives is connected to all this?
17 posted on
08/11/2005 3:40:43 AM PDT by
YaYa123
(@Mark Levin Fan.com)
To: YaYa123
I have a question...say Burglar is involved in this....hasn't he already pled guilty and accepted a deal but not sentenced yet....is it too late to bring additional charges?
20 posted on
08/11/2005 3:44:53 AM PDT by
mystery-ak
(Home of the free, because of the Brave)
To: YaYa123
No you are not stupid. The Clinton's hate of the military is what is all behind their failure to act.
This country is gone if somehow the Hildabeast is elected in 08.
I hope that Ashcroft and any others that know what did or did not happen in regards to terrorism during the Clinton administration will continue to speak out lour and clear.
24 posted on
08/11/2005 3:52:00 AM PDT by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
To: YaYa123
"
Am I stupid for thinking Sandy Berger's heist at the National Archives is connected to all this?"
No. Any who think otherwise are either brain dead or programmed. ;)
26 posted on
08/11/2005 3:58:01 AM PDT by
G.Mason
To: YaYa123
Do you think the 9-ll Commission, or the MSM, will ever castigate Reno's Justice Dept, Jamie Gorelick specifically, for creating "the wall"? (Castigate? Hellsbells, I'd appreciate a wrist slap at this point.) Will we ever know why "the wall" was created? Am I stupid for thinking Sandy Berger's heist at the National Archives is connected to all this? Don't expect the spineless, gutless, ball-less Republican "leadership" to investigate any of this.
To: YaYa123
Will we ever know why "the wall" was created? I am just guessing but I suspect one reason may have been to obstruct FBI,CIA evidence about Clintons campaign contribution for missile technology deals with the Chi-coms.
48 posted on
08/11/2005 4:27:38 AM PDT by
carlr
To: YaYa123
65 posted on
08/11/2005 5:06:24 AM PDT by
UglyinLA
To: YaYa123
No. The documents that Berger took and destroyed were "copies" that were sent to staff personnel and then returned with comments and possibly individual annotations, thus making them "originals". Berger could have easily eliminated incriminating evidence when he destroyed them...
Mission accomplished, covered complete.
And Berger then gets off with a hand slap...
Gorelick and other Clintonistas get assigned to the 9/11 commission and co-op the report by suppressing intel that indicates info was available (like the SOCOM reports).
This needs to be investigated by someone with the authority to take sworn testimony.
You can bet that Conyers and company will not be setting up their cafeteria tables in the Capitol basement to hold "hearings" on this one.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson