Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Historic Cape Canaveral tower toppled
Air Force Link ^ | 10 Aug 2005 | Air Force News

Posted on 08/11/2005 1:55:27 AM PDT by JRios1968

CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, Fla. (AFPN) -- What took years to build required only seconds to knock down Aug. 6 when 171 pounds of strategically placed explosives toppled a historic 179-foot mobile service tower here.

The 1,300-ton structure was used to launch 51 Atlas/Agena space vehicles in the 1960s and 1970s. The most famous of those launches were five Lunar Orbiter missions for NASA in 1966 and 1967. Those missions photographed about 99 percent of the moon’s surface and helped pave the way for men landing on the moon in 1969.

The last launch from the complex was in April 1978 and then the pad was abandoned. Mother Nature then whittled away at the complex and the old tower, leaving a badly corroded structure in its wake.

(Excerpt) Read more at af.mil ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: nasa; spaceprogram
A historic piece of the space program is removed, due to years of neglect.

CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, Fla. -- A 1,300-ton structure here is demolished Aug. 6. The 179-foot mobile service tower was used to launch 51 Atlas/Agena space launch vehicles in the 1960s and 1970s. (U.S. Air Force photo)

1 posted on 08/11/2005 1:55:28 AM PDT by JRios1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
A historic piece of the space program is removed, due to years of neglect.

Do you propose money be spent to maintain an unused facility?

2 posted on 08/11/2005 2:01:32 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Not at all. Just chronicling the wastefulness inherent in letting a facility sit unused for 26+ years, instead of refurbishing and re-using it when they had a chance (in 1978.) Of course, we do know who was running things back in 1978...


3 posted on 08/11/2005 2:08:03 AM PDT by JRios1968 (If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
Well, there are dozens of launch pads at the Cape, many dating from the 1950's. They are not refurbished for re-use because it would cost more to do that than to build all new facilities for new rocket systems elsewhere.

These decisions are made strictly on a cost basis, not to wantonly destroy landmarks of historical significance.

4 posted on 08/11/2005 2:40:51 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Do you propose money be spent to maintain an unused facility?

Didn't we just approve a $300,000,000.00 spending package for the beautification of California's highways? With all the pork in DC you would figure that preserving a key historical site would have been worth the cost of a couple of coats of paint.
5 posted on 08/11/2005 3:12:05 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

Exactly. Not only that, this pad, along with many others, could have easily been recycled (refurbished?) for possible use in modern-day or future space projects. Instead, it was allowed to sit, rotting away for 26 years before someone decided "hey, let's bring it down."


6 posted on 08/11/2005 3:22:34 AM PDT by JRios1968 (If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson