[Rembrandt_fan]

Nope, not intimidated by collective Clinton voodoo, but do know that Hillary has near-universal voter recognition, which translates to millions (and millions) of dollars. That recognition, combined with her increasingly hawkish positioning on national defense and her 'centering' on controversial policies like abortion, make her a formidable opponent. If Republicans throw a dark horse against her out of some misguided sense of idealogical purity, we lose. And regardless of what Democrats in Ohio might say, losing is a bad thing.

[Clemenza]

We can do better than Rudy the Rino. I'd even go for Romney over him, and that's not saying much.

[Clemenza]

Remember:

1975: Jimmy who?

1991: Bill who?

[birbear]

Nope, not intimidated by collective Clinton voodoo, but do know that Hillary has near-universal voter recognition, which translates to millions (and millions) of dollars. That recognition, combined with her increasingly hawkish positioning on national defense and her 'centering' on controversial policies like abortion, make her a formidable opponent. If Republicans throw a dark horse against her out of some misguided sense of idealogical purity, we lose. And regardless of what Democrats in Ohio might say, losing is a bad thing.

Thanks for putting in words what I feel.