Replies

Referring to Rudy Guiliani, you wrote, "He would be a DISASTER for our party and the presidency."

In order for Rudy to be a disaster for either, he would need to win. Insofar as I can tell, he's the only established Republican face with a chance against Hillary--with the possible exception of John McCain, who seemingly belongs to some shadow party consisting of himself and an adoring media. I left my Magic 8-Ball at home, but I'm guessing Rudy would win the primaries regardless of his RINO status among many--including yourself--in the party base. His leadership skills are proven, as are his administrative and managerial abilities, and he is already nationally known. Calling his candidacy a disaster is pure hyperbole. Hillary Clinton is the disaster waiting to happen. Find the candidate it takes to beat her, and we can split idealogical hairs later.

he's the only established Republican face with a chance against Hillary--with the possible exception of John McCain,

Hillary aint that popular. You guys seem to think that she has some magical powers over the electorate and that she would sell in middle America. As a result, you believe that only a Rockefeller Republican can beat her.

I fear Bill Richarson or Evan Bayh more than I do Hillary.

You are right on.
That is why I said what I did.
I cannot think of another person who is as well known, is a bulldog on national defense ....and who could take her.
Deep down there are many democrats who are uneasy about ole Hillary as Commander in Chief.
I was just being real....Rudy could take on Hillary and win. I can't think of another person who could...can you>?