Thanks for acknowledging the obvious, positive changes in economic policy never produce results over night. It's like steering the largest oil tankers. Slight moves take a while to produce results.
You asked. It's so funny. On the one hand, people say the Bush tax cuts have already fueled growth. Yet, the Clinton economic policies had nothing to do, so they say, with the expansion that followed. The Reagan tax cuts apparently took a while to take hold. maybe the Clinton boom was really a Reagan boom. But wait! The boom wasn't real! It was all a hoax. So was it the Reagan hoax? I am not saying I know what the best way to go is, but I can recognize BS.