You asked. It's so funny. On the one hand, people say the Bush tax cuts have already fueled growth. Yet, the Clinton economic policies had nothing to do, so they say, with the expansion that followed. The Reagan tax cuts apparently took a while to take hold. maybe the Clinton boom was really a Reagan boom. But wait! The boom wasn't real! It was all a hoax. So was it the Reagan hoax? I am not saying I know what the best way to go is, but I can recognize BS.
Clinton's boom was over just before he left office. Reagan's tax cuts, the dot com rise (and fall), decent commodity prices and a few other less significant factors fueled the Clinton boom.