PIRRO=HILLARY SLEEPING WITH A KENNEDY

Jeanine Pirro.com ^ | www.politicsWNY.com

[stuckinNY-NJ]

From Pirro profile about her campaign website:

"On it she features photos of herself with figures as ... environmental activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr."

There you go everyone who wants to join Pirro band wagon. When you sleep with dogs you wake up with fleas

[stuckinNY-NJ]

RIGHT and Hillary will rhetorically move to the right of Pirro because the MSM will let her to do so and Pirro will be busy dealing with indictment/conviction/scandal du jour stories about Al Pirro

[Mia T]

and it won't work.
In case you haven't noticed,
the MSM is no longer setting the agenda.

[stuckinNY-NJ]

In case you haven't noticed they still run NYS, in case you haven't noticed they made the Presidential election closer than it should have been. Wake up to these realities. You are clearly very intelligent. Think about this rationally

[blackie]

Thanks Mia T ~ if the lunatic left goes after Pirro's husband, all that has to be done is remind people that hillary's husband was impeached, sued for sexual harassment which he settled of court for nearly $1mil, was found guilty of lying to the court, fined $50K and disbarment for 5 years. :)

I might be off with the figures, it's been a while and I have many senior moments. :)

[Mia T]

Regarding Al...

1. Jeanine has been reelected repeatedly with the same husband. It's a sure bet she'll dispose of the garbage with one sound bite delivered a smile.

   
   "Married to the Mob" and other stop-Jeanine sillygisms

   
   
   

2. As for elephants in rooms, nothing rivals the elephants in the Hildabeast's living room.
   • What Bush 41 knew in 1992
   • What every congressman and senator knew in 1998
   • What everyone knows today

We used to execute rapists and traitors. Today we elect them president?

New York, New York -- if hillary can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere

 

HILLARY DUD -- NOT DUFF -- PORTENDS JEANINE WIN

 

BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST

• JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman
• HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women

 

 

 

the MAD hillary series
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD

madhillary.com (coming soon)
madhillary.blogspot.com
_{COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005}

MAD hillary talks series #1 ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE	MAD hillary talks series #2 HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
MAD hillary talks series #3 "What, me worry?" THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE	MAD hillary talks series #4 NANO-PRESIDENT the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton
MAD hillary talks series #5 SCHEMA PINOCCHIO how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

[stuckinNY-NJ]

Jeannine almost LOST to a know name in 2001. Al had something to do about it. The Journal News ain't that powerful, wait until the medai heavyweights pick his the stories about Al, especially the forthcoming ones

[Mia T]

excellent. thanx. :) bump.

 

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson

I think all we have to do is inform the moderate women of the CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN

In order to have any chance of winning (in order to offset her almost universal repulsiveness to men), missus clinton must get virtually every moderate female vote extant...

which she won't when we fill them in on the clintons' 30-year record of abusive and criminal treatment of women...

or when we inform the 'security moms' of the clintons' utter failure to fight terrorism.
(see HAROLD ICKES: on winning the presidency by terrorizing white women)

The elephants in the Hildabeast's living room:

• What Bush 41 knew in 1992
• What every congressman and senator knew in 1998
• What everyone knows today

We used to execute rapists and traitors. Today we elect them president?

deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

[Mia T]

If, as you claim, the MSM is so omnipotent in NY, and if the electorate in NY is so intractably uninformed, misinformed and disinformed, then the political orientation of the GOP candidate is irrelevant.

[blackie]

Prefect ~ thanks!

[blackie]

Sorry ~ Perfect!

[Mia T]

you're welcome. :)

[blackie]

:):):)

[Palladin]

The Clinton machine is in chaos. They did not expect to be called back from Martha's Vineyard in the middle of summer vacation to mount a campaign against Pirro.

[Palladin]

That photo is ancient. Jeanine didn't even tweeze her eyebrows back then, and Robert Kennedy looks sober.

[Palladin]

I agree. New York is a pro-abortion state. NY legalized abortion on demand years before the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973.

The abortion issue is a non-starter in any Senatorial campaign there.

[hosepipe]

This thread reminds me....

FOR SALE: Dumass 2000 flying broom w/ viberator...
call 234-6543 ask for hosepipe.. (only used by Hillary once)

[stuckinNY-NJ]

Wrong again. The MSM will push for the pro-life candidate becuase they think, mistakenly that it will help Hillary. They are wrong as are you and those who agree with you.

If anyone of you bothered to do your homework you would see that a candidate running on the GOP and Conservative line who is pro-life hasn't gotten less then 47% in well over a decade.

Name the first time Westchester DA candidate who had no name ID, no money, no party support and still nearly beat Pirro. Do your homework for change

[Mia T]

You appear to be driven by the abortion issue.

This issue is soon to be mooted by medical science. Check out my piece, ROE, MEDICAL SCIENCE, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, ROSS PEROT + HILLARY CLINTON and the related Blankley piece.

This issue also can be mooted instantaneously by the deployment of a single WMD in the middle of Manhattan.

Regarding your election statistics, unless the win was by a plurality, the hapless candidate who got 47% running on the dual ticket in fact lost, according to my math.

As for your thinking generally, I have two words for you: Ockham's razor.

[stuckinNY-NJ]

AHHH, there you go. I am NOT driven the this single issue, but any GOPer who is 100% pro-choice and rated as such by NARAL, any GOPer who is featured in an anti-Bush TV spot like Pirro was, is CLEARLY driven by a single issue. If she was moderate like Lazio that would be one thing, but if like SEAN HANNITY is calling NARAL an extremist organization and she received 100% rating from NARAL, then what does that make her?