Wrong again. The MSM will push for the pro-life candidate becuase they think, mistakenly that it will help Hillary. They are wrong as are you and those who agree with you.
If anyone of you bothered to do your homework you would see that a candidate running on the GOP and Conservative line who is pro-life hasn't gotten less then 47% in well over a decade.
Name the first time Westchester DA candidate who had no name ID, no money, no party support and still nearly beat Pirro. Do your homework for change
You appear to be driven by the abortion issue.
This issue is soon to be mooted by medical science. Check out my piece, ROE, MEDICAL SCIENCE, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, ROSS PEROT + HILLARY CLINTON and the related Blankley piece.
This issue also can be mooted instantaneously by the deployment of a single WMD in the middle of Manhattan.
Regarding your election statistics, unless the win was by a plurality, the hapless candidate who got 47% running on the dual ticket in fact lost, according to my math.
As for your thinking generally, I have two words for you: Ockham's razor.