Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/10/2005 1:05:03 AM PDT by Cougar66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cougar66
The Commission has been DISBANDED. Get Over It.

Its Clinton's fault anyway.

2 posted on 08/10/2005 1:12:30 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

These people are like bad pennies, aren't they? When I think of Gorelick being on this commission, I'm reminded of Colin Ferguson cross-examining his victims.

"So, then what happened?"

"Well, then YOU approached me and threatened me with YOUR pistol!"


3 posted on 08/10/2005 1:15:38 AM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66
"the 9/11 Commission looked into the matter during its investigation into government missteps leading to the attacks and chose not to include it in the final report"



That's because Jamie Gorelick was on the Commission and not a WITNESS UNDER OATH!!! She is THE PERSON who wrote the "MEMO" to keep agencies from SHARING INFORMATION!!!

I don't know who the Commission thinks it's fooling by trying to pretend they didn't know any of this. What a bunch of liars!

Anyone who was involved with the Clinton administration should be IN JAIL! How can ANYONE even THINK of electing HILLARY CLINTON as president?!!!

4 posted on 08/10/2005 1:19:16 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

We'll never know the trVth, Sandy Berger's dog ate it.


5 posted on 08/10/2005 1:20:02 AM PDT by Capn TrVth ("India, -dangling like a chad from the ballot of Asia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

Why does OJ looking for the real killer come to mind?


6 posted on 08/10/2005 1:21:06 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66
There is one member of the 9/11 Commission who does NOT want this subjecgt pursued. Before she was a Commission member, Jamie Gorelick was a Deputy Attorney General under AG Janet Reno. Jamie got that appointment because Hillary Clinton wanted her in there.

Gorelick wrote the "wall of separation" memo that kept military intelligence agencies from talking to FBI officials. Her memo was directed at the Director of the FBI and told him and his agency what they could not do.

In short, Gorelick's memo contributed to the bad result in this situation, and presumably others. She should never have been a member of the Commission. Instead, she should have been sworn as a witness and cross-examined under oath.

She is why the Commission didn't deal with this subject in its report. And she definitely doesn't want an investigation that will find her fingerprints on this failure of intelligence about Mohammed Atta.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "The Washington Post Doesn't Have a Clue about Government Under a Written Constitution"

7 posted on 08/10/2005 1:38:40 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

bttt


8 posted on 08/10/2005 1:40:40 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

The Commission is going to have to re-constitute itself so it can cover up this latest embarrassment. Gorelick knows that all roads lead back to her...


12 posted on 08/10/2005 3:15:16 AM PDT by gridlock (IF YOU'RE NOT CATCHING FLAK, YOU'RE NOT OVER THE TARGET...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

The real crime is the cover up by the media .No mention that this took place during the Clinton administration...MSM is at it again..


13 posted on 08/10/2005 3:18:08 AM PDT by Reconray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

Lee Hamilton wants to get back in the spotlight. There was ZERO chance that he or his feckless commission was going to admit anything implicating Bill Clinton's treasonous administration with Jamie Gorelick on the commission. She is an expert at putting up firewalls for Clinton, after all. Not one more dime should be wasted on this know-nothing/see-nothing commission.


14 posted on 08/10/2005 3:21:41 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

And let's make sure that the timing of the Able Danger information that was ignored was 1999 and 2000. During Clinton's term.


15 posted on 08/10/2005 3:59:07 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

Bet Jaimie Gorelick doesn't...


16 posted on 08/10/2005 4:00:37 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66
Members of the commission that uncovered the government's failures to share intelligence among agencies before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks want to know whether U.S. defense intelligence officials knew for more than a year that four of the hijackers were part of an al-Qaida cell but failed to tell law enforcement. ... "The 9/11 commission did not learn of any U.S. government knowledge prior to 9/11 of surveillance of Mohammed Atta or of his cell," said Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana. "Had we learned of it obviously it would've been a major focus of our investigation."

[]

But Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the 9/11 Commission looked into the matter during its investigation into government missteps leading to the attacks and chose not to include it in the final report.

Because the Commission was designed to do nothing but knock Bush before the 2004 elections. They deliberately left this info out. The denials by Hamiliton et al are sick. (IMO).
20 posted on 08/10/2005 4:28:36 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

Bravo to COngessman Weldon (my district) for bringing this to light!!!

BTW, I beleive the 911 commission meets at least once a year for updates. It was not a one shot deal.


22 posted on 08/10/2005 4:31:02 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

This tidbit is but the tip of the iceberg which we will use to take Hillary apart in 2008.


23 posted on 08/10/2005 4:36:58 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

9/11 HIJACKERS KNOWN IN ADVANCE

Republican Congressman Curt Weldon from Pennsylvania has made the explosive allegation that more than a year before the attacks on 9/11, Clinton administration intelligence officials knew who four of the hijackers were, including ringleader Mohammed Atta. So why wasn't anything done?

Because information wasn't allowed to be shared between federal agencies, thanks to 9/11 commissioner and former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick (not pronounced the way it's spelled.) She instituted rules that forbade sharing of intelligence between, for instance, the CIA and the FBI. She was reportedly hired at the insistence of The Hildabeast. Thank you Hillary Clinton.

Here's what Weldon told the New York Times. He says a military group, called 'Able Danger' had identified the four terrorists, knew they were trouble and said the FBI should know about it. They were rejected, because of Gorelick's rules. Since the Islamic hijackers had legitimate visas, Able Danger's recommendation was turned down. A quote from Weldon: "In fact, I'll tell you how stupid it was, they put stickies on the faces of Mohammed Atta on the chart that the military intelligence unit had completed and they said you can't talk to Atta because he's here." Curt Weldon say he got the info from some of the agents in the Able Danger unit.

If true, and there's no reason to believe it isn't, this is yet another example of how the debacle of 9/11 should be laid at the feet of the Clinton administration. No president did more to ignore the mounting threat of Islamic terrorism than did Bill Clinton, and 3,000 people paid for his policies with their lives.

The 9/11 Commission is coming back to investigate this one. We'll be watching.


25 posted on 08/10/2005 5:39:26 AM PDT by conservativecorner (It's a cult of death and submission to fanatics Larry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66
Former Attorney General Ashcroft exposed what this commission was allllll about. The Soviet style show trial was little more than a common liberal political tool to win an upcoming election, and apply a thick cover of whitewash covering the former copresidents. One of which believes she is owed that supreme power all by herself.

Hillry may well be the key that unlocks what was going on during that reign. She was the stealth president that has never been required to tell what she knew and when she knew it. Sitting liberal senators appear to be the most protected individuals upon this earth.
27 posted on 08/10/2005 5:50:45 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

bttt


29 posted on 08/10/2005 6:46:06 AM PDT by Kay Syrah (always remember your towel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cougar66

This new information just ads to the question "what exactly did Sandy Burger stuff in his pants and socks?"


30 posted on 08/10/2005 7:31:51 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson