Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe 6-pack
Thanks. I was wondering about that.

Adultery is always serious, but you wonder if something happens during a war, if the guy or gal would be tossed out.

81 posted on 08/10/2005 5:30:38 PM PDT by McGavin999 ("You must call evil by it's name" GW Bush ......... It's name is Terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: McGavin999
The military (at least the Army of my experience) was not so concerned with the moral aspects of adultery as it was with the effect on morale, public trust, and discipline.

The UCMJ is tailored to, in many ways, allow commanders at all echelons to effect a command climate as they see fit. Some commanders at higher echelons will reserve adjudication of certain offenses to themselves, and during my years I saw adultery treated in very different ways. I actually knew of one commander who imposed an Article 15 with the absolute minimum punishment (suspended at that), remarking that it was an offense and the evidence led him to believe that it had been commited, and as such he was duty bound to impose punishment, but other than that he saw the offense as silly. I knew other commanders who viewed it as an egregious offense....

82 posted on 08/10/2005 5:37:39 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson