Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: Crackingham
Everything would be just peachy if the bastards would stick to original intent.
2 posted on
08/09/2005 1:40:21 PM PDT by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: Crackingham
Breyer defended using overseas legal opinions as a guide only, adding, "It has hit a political nerve."
You POS, Breyer. Getting a little defensive, eh?
3 posted on
08/09/2005 1:41:05 PM PDT by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: Crackingham
Sorry judgey-poo, but you don't get to rule the world and be above criticism too. Not yet anyway. Stop usurping power and you will stop being criticized.
4 posted on
08/09/2005 1:41:10 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Crackingham
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Tuesday that rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence. Breyer urged lawyers to help educate people about court responsibility to be an independent decision-maker.He isn't a decision maker. It is his job to interpret the Constitution, not to divine new meanings out of what he presumes is the spirit of its text.
And why do I know this and he doesn't...
Regards, Ivan
5 posted on
08/09/2005 1:41:47 PM PDT by
MadIvan
(You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
To: Crackingham
these jerk-boes are supposed to the judiciary of the USA not some euro-wheenie, commie version of utopia!
when will they get a clue that they are supposed to be 'judging' according to the law and not whomever just gave them or their party the largest chunk of change!
6 posted on
08/09/2005 1:41:52 PM PDT by
NoClones
To: Crackingham
bttt...this should be interesting!
Need to read later (printed it out).
7 posted on
08/09/2005 1:42:31 PM PDT by
meema
To: Crackingham
Breyer can go straight to h**l. No one in this entire country is above criticism. NO ONE!
8 posted on
08/09/2005 1:42:44 PM PDT by
PAMadMax
(Islam is the enemy of all mankind...AlJazeera is its PR Firm)
To: Crackingham
"threatening judicial independence"
Alrighty then......
To: Crackingham
SOLUTION: Interpret the constitution. Don't set policy, make law, or be guided by emotion.
To: Crackingham
12 posted on
08/09/2005 1:44:23 PM PDT by
MileHi
To: Crackingham
Well let's just delcare criticism of the Supreme Court unconstitutional.
13 posted on
08/09/2005 1:44:24 PM PDT by
Lost Highway
(I don't know what the world may need but a V8 engines a good start for me)
To: Crackingham
This is crap. If the people can see that judges reach a reasonable conclusion from case law, legislation, or the Constitution, they will not object and will accept it.
However, if they see a political ruling from a judge, there will be protests. We are a free people and will not be ruled by oligarchs.
To: Crackingham
Justice Breyer is quite correct that judges need to make independent, unbiased decisions. But then again he hardly can ask that the public just not give a damn no matter what the court decides. If it's the applicability of a certain statute to hog slapping in Alabama, maybe no big deal. But when the judges start deciding the Constitution outlaws the death penalty, guarantees legal abortions, permits cities to take private property for developers, and should be interpreted via the foreign law of other countries - watch out. Independent is one thing, addle brained is another.
16 posted on
08/09/2005 1:45:26 PM PDT by
Williams
To: Crackingham
If the creeping creeps would read the constitution and apply the principles therein, they wouldn't be attacked politically.
To: Crackingham
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Tuesday that rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence. Breyer urged lawyers to help educate people about court responsibility to be an independent decision-maker. If certain Supremes want to act like politicians (or, still worse, use foreign law to interpret the US constitution) then they should lose their lifetime appointments and get elected like every other political hack in black robes.
To: Crackingham
Dear Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer:
Just a friendly word. Go fornicate yourself, you lying hypocrite, deceitful, grandiose, Constitution defiling, judicial tyrant.
To: Crackingham
"Pay no attention to the man behind the gavel!!"
20 posted on
08/09/2005 1:47:20 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Crackingham
If Mr. Breyer didn't involve himself in politics by making nakedly political decisions, and even asserting his right to do so (which doesn't exist), then he would not face political opposition.
Don't like the heat, get out of the kitchen...
To: Crackingham
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Tuesday that rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence.Threatening judicial activism! That's what Breyer is worried about.
25 posted on
08/09/2005 1:48:28 PM PDT by
airborne
To: Crackingham
When judges abandoned the rule of law for the rule of personal politics, they doomed the independence of the judiciary. Nixon has been accused of abusing his power as chief executive, but he was only one president. The Supreme Court has institutionalized the practice.
27 posted on
08/09/2005 1:51:06 PM PDT by
Spok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson