Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatnotlazy
Most farmers -- and I assume peanut farmers are no different -- would prefer that the government exit their markets. The high support prices constrain their marketing; the associated acreage controls constrain their productivity.

Most would rather be free to make their own planting decisions and rely on their productivity to compete in a free global market.

The government's support prices are designed to protect the most inefficient among them. And whenever there is a vote, the farmer who plants 2000 A of corn has only one vote, no more than the farmer who plants 20 A.

94 posted on 08/10/2005 8:40:19 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

It's a shame..schemes like these are supposed to benefit the farmer, but anyone I ever heard about (and a couple I've talked to personally) all tell me they see little if anything from these "supports." In Pennsylvania, there is a milk marketing board which sets an artificially high minimum price for milk; yet the dairy farmers receive little of that money. Where does it go? I think I know -- politicians' pockets.

Little by little the family farm is disappearing...when it's gone completely, we will be stuck with corporations which will charge ridiculously high prices for their products. And everything will be genetically altered or grown with pesticides and chemicals -- you'll find few, if any, organic farmers. Not only that, but a tradition -- a way of life -- will be lost forever.


95 posted on 08/10/2005 9:06:13 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson