Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
I wasn't lying.

Certainly you were. Very little I say is ambiguous, I say what I mean and I mean what I say. You took liberty with the truth by making a false assertion and then using that false assertion as evidence of my "unAmerican" views.

My standard reply to such crap is to tell that person to kiss my American ass. Consider yourself the recipient of the standard reply. I'm done being civil with you.

93 posted on 08/11/2005 5:43:51 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
The only thing I took the "liberty" of doing was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that you were making any kind of relevant point. Don't worry, I won't make the same mistake in the future.

In the meantime, I'm glad that you're apparently now not contesting the fact that presidential wartime conduct can be subject to judicial review. He's subject to the law at all times, and nothing in the Constitution says that the courts don't have cognizance of the law when it pertains to his conduct.

94 posted on 08/11/2005 7:41:29 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson