[inquest]

The only thing I took the "liberty" of doing was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that you were making any kind of relevant point. Don't worry, I won't make the same mistake in the future.

In the meantime, I'm glad that you're apparently now not contesting the fact that presidential wartime conduct can be subject to judicial review. He's subject to the law at all times, and nothing in the Constitution says that the courts don't have cognizance of the law when it pertains to his conduct.

[jwalsh07]

LOL, you really should seek help.