[Howlin]

I don't know who makes me sicker –

Farah makes me pretty sick.

[JCEccles]

Do you agree with the SCOTUS decision in Romer v. Evans? With Lawrence v. Texas?

[goldstategop]

Well, he's still is right - what do people know about his core values and his real beliefs? That's exactly the point. Its significant he worked in a case in which the SCOTUS later overturned the will of the people, which later gave us legalized sodomy anf may well establish gay marriage as the law of the land. The point is if he objected to advancing the liberal agenda, he didn't have to. I have a doubt about a person committed to judicial supremacy. Granted, its just one case but for the Left, that may be all they need to know he won't be a threat to them when he gets on the bench.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[Redleg Duke]

Yeah, that five hours of pro bono work, playing Jusge Scalia in a Moot Court is hardly what I would call "leading the charge for homosexuality".

I suspect that the tactic by the left, played by the LA Slimes is to split conservatives on what the left considers to be a dangerous threat to their control of the courts.

As usual, conservative "purists" continue to be their own worst enemies as the eagerly chase the sock puppets held in front of them by the left.

[lugsoul]

Why would Farah care? I mean, will the SCOTUS even be an issue after the suitcase nukes go off? [sarcasm]