[goldstategop]

Well, he's still is right - what do people know about his core values and his real beliefs? That's exactly the point. Its significant he worked in a case in which the SCOTUS later overturned the will of the people, which later gave us legalized sodomy anf may well establish gay marriage as the law of the land. The point is if he objected to advancing the liberal agenda, he didn't have to. I have a doubt about a person committed to judicial supremacy. Granted, its just one case but for the Left, that may be all they need to know he won't be a threat to them when he gets on the bench.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[Howlin]

what do people know about his core values and his real beliefs?

You mean what do you know about him?

Or do you take George W. Bush to be a fool?

[ThePythonicCow]

Its significant he worked in a case in which the SCOTUS later overturned the will of the people

When the will of the people is in clear violation of the plain text of the Constitution, then that law cannot stand. That's why we live in a constitutional republic, not a simply democracy.

which later gave us legalized sodomy anf may well establish gay marriage as the law of the land

Just because the talking heads on TV connect one case favorable to gays with the next such case, does not in anyway mean that the legal principles deciding one also decided the next.

[Dave S]

which later gave us legalized sodomy

Give me a break. Although some jurisdictions had anti-sodomy laws on the books, few states had arrested and convicted anyone under these laws in decades. Sodomy has been decriminalized for years. Even in Texas it was a rarity. You are blowing the decision way out of proportion.