Posted on 08/07/2005 9:42:11 AM PDT by Sabramerican
Sunday, August 7, 2005 Text: Netanyahu's Resignation Letter
[Unofficial translation by IMRA]
7 August 2005
Mr. Ariel Sharon Prime Minister Jerusalem
Sir;
From the first conversation when you presented your plan to me, I told you that I oppose unilateral withdrawal without anything in return, that in my estimation will strengthen the forces of terror. As a minimum I asked for the inclusion of the settlement blocs within the security fence before the beginning of the withdrawal and the holding of the Philadephi Corridor in our hands. In this way we would be neutralizing the impression that we are running away from terror and instead shows that we are choosing a new defense line in accordance with out national interests. In addition, we set that after then the Government would be able to consider if to decide on the evacuation in light of the reality developing in the area.
To my sorrow, the security fence has not been completed around the settlement blocs, the Philadelphi Corridor will be handed over to the Palestinians, and worse than that, we will allow the Palestinians to open a sea port that will be open to the terror boats.
To my disappointment, the Government ignores reality. As I warned, the Hamas is strengthening, the terror continues, the firing of rockets and mortars on our communities has not ended, and terror elements proclaim that they will move the rockets that drove us out of the Gaza Strip to Judea and Samaria, and from there will operate them until "the complete liberation of Palestine."
I do not know when the terror will break out in full force. It is possible that it will take a month or two or a year or two. It is possible that the terror will first break out in Judea and Samaria. I hope that it won't break out at all. But just as I warned in 1993 that the Oslo Agreement will bring attacks from Judea and Samaria and rockets from Gaza, so I unfortunately am convinced today that the current move will bring in the course of time to an increase in terror rather than a decrease. As you know full well, security officials also confirm that in the wake of the unilateral withdrawal they expect an increase in terror in the mid-run.
In summary: it is becoming increasingly clear that the unilateral withdrawal under fire doesn't give us anything. The opposite; it endanger the security of Israel, divide the Nation, and sets the principle of withdrawal to the '67 lines that are no defendable.
This is not the way to achieve peace.
I always thought that the withdrawal from Gaza is possible in an agreement or for a reasonable consideration. That is not the case now. Therefore, what are we receiving in return for the withdrawal? What are we receiving for uprooting families with their children, their homes, their graves! We will receive an Islamic terror base.
After the terror attacks in New York, Washington, London and Sinai, the world begins to understand that it is necessary to fight terror and not make compromises. The international community understands more and more that it is impossible to fight terror by running away from it, because the accumulating experience shows that the terror only strengthens and pursues us. And yet Israel, which showed the world the way to fight terror, now, goes in the completely opposite direction.
In recent months I hoped that the Government would open its eyes against this clear reality and change direction. But the opposite happened. A balanced Government that reflected the will of the People in the last elections has turned into a Government that carries out automatically policies that oppose the principles of the Likud and the mandate that we received from our voters.
Mister Prime Minister, you could have kept a balanced National Government. You could have prevented the splitting of the Nation. Over the course of months I asked for a national referendum that would maintain unity in the Government and the Nation. To my sorrow, you chose to oppose it, as before you chose to ignore the referendum of the Likud members that you initiated and whose results you promised to honor. Now, in these hard days before us, the need for reserve, control and responsibility from all parts of the Nation and the Government is greater than ever.
All this time I remained in the Government despite my growing opposition to the withdrawal given the developments. I did this as an attempt to minimize the dangers and damages resulting from the unilateral withdrawal. An attempt that to my sorrow has been exhausted. And I did it out of responsibility to my position as minister of the treasury. We are in the middle of carrying out a revolution of reforms and privatizations unprecedented in the market, which will strengthen the State of Israel and its economy. These days I completed the two last reforms, in banks and reducing taxes, and I prepared a responsible State budget that I developed in complete coordination with you.
When I entered my position two and a half years ago, the Israeli economy was on the edge of collapse. Today this economy is healthy, growing and vibrant. If the economic policies that I led are not changed, the growth will continue and reach all parts of the Nation.
Today we reached the moment of truth. There is a way to reach peace and security. Unilateral withdrawal under fire without compensation is not the way. I am not prepared to be a partner to a step that ignores reality and blindly advances the establishment of an Islamic terror base that will threaten the State. I am not prepared to be a partner to an irresponsible move that endanger the security of Israel, divides the Nation, sets the principle of withdrawal to the '67 lines, and in the future even endangers the unity of Jerusalem.
Therefore I advise today of my resignation from the Government.
Best regards, Binyamin Netanyahu
How long before the rockets start raining down in the Negev towns? Maybe a month or two.
Good luck to Minister Netanyahu and Israel.
See him rant and rave.
He was willing to sign over part of Hebron to the Pals in 1997, though.
I would rather see Natan Sharansky rise to the leadership of the Likud Party and become Prime Minister, or even others who don't have Netanyahu's baggage (and silly wife).
What is going on? Why is Sharon caving like this?
Natan would be a great PM, I fully trust him, unlike Bibi.
He says he would have done the same thing as Sharon in exchange for something.
He would have gladly traded it away.
"I always thought that the withdrawal from Gaza is possible in an agreement or for a reasonable consideration."
I agree with you. Natan Sharansky is the man they need to turn to.
Netanyahu's day is past. He has become part of the problem...
agree
Check it out...
When the safety, security and very existence of your family, your community and your country are at stake, ranting can be a good thing.
He has been proven correct in the past.
Only time will tell us if he is again correct.
I conclude from your name that you are not in Israel.
My comment was addressed to "anotherview" specifically and was sarcastic.
I have held Netanyahu's view from day one. I have had a running debate with "anotherview" who supports Sharon's insanity. "Anotherview" has characterized my, and now Netanyahu's, views as ranting and raving.
The sad thing is that both Netanyahu and Sharon have been right, and both have been good leaders. In the past.
Did Golda Meir have any daughters, or at least nieces?
likud is no longer the answer. likud is likely finished in its current form. sharon loyalists vs everyone else likely means a break up resulting in a nationalist faction and establishment sharon faction. the nationalist faction could (i say this very cautiously) link up in the elections but not merge with the national union.
sharansky isnt the answer either:
http://www.mideasttruth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1768
Here's the full text:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006143
What is your take on Sharansky's comments?
Are they misguided?
Do you think President Bush is following Sharansky's (misguided) views?
Golda Meir was PM when the Yom Kippur War began and she could have prevented the terrible casualties that Israel suffered if she had moved before Egypt crossed the Suez Canal. So don't look for her heirs for succor.
Sharansky is a paragon of courage and integrity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.