Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran unconcerned about Security Council referral
Yahoo News ^ | By Parisa Hafezi

Posted on 08/07/2005 3:14:13 AM PDT by F14 Pilot

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran on Sunday reiterated plans to resume uranium conversion this week and said it was unconcerned about referral of its nuclear case to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions.

"Although we think referral of Iran's case to the Security Council would be unlawful and politically motivated, if one day they refer Iran's case...we won't be worried in the least," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi.

Britain, Germany and France, heading nuclear negotiations with Iran for the European Union, have called an emergency meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) Board of Governors on Tuesday to discuss Iran's case.

The EU trio say they will recommend referring Iran to the Security Council if it goes ahead with plans to break U.N. seals and resume work at the Isfahan uranium conversion plant.

Iran, which on Saturday rejected an EU package of economic and political incentives designed to persuade it to halt nuclear fuel work for good, says it will restart the Isfahan plant as soon as IAEA surveillance equipment is in place.

"The European proposal has no value," state television quoted Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi as saying.

"We will insist on our rights and have decided to resume Isfahan activities as the first step of our measures. This does not mean we will stop negotiations with Europe," he added.

ADDITIONAL CAMERAS

Asefi, speaking at a weekly news conference, said IAEA technicians would be at the Isfahan plant on Monday to install additional cameras.

He said the 35-page EU proposal, which contained an offer of help with developing a civilian nuclear program, was rejected because it did not recognize Iran's right to enrich uranium. Iran's official reply will be delivered to the EU on Monday.

"I suggest that the Europeans avoid the language of threat," Asefi said. "The only way is to encourage Iran and respect its rights."

Iran says its nuclear program is solely designed to produce much-needed electricity and is not, as Washington insists, a cover for making atomic bombs.

It says that as a signatory of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty it has the right to produce its own fuel for nuclear reactors, a process that can also be used to make bomb-grade material.

Iran's new president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, at his swearing-in ceremony on Saturday, said Iran would not be intimidated by threats from the West.

A religious conservative fiercely loyal to the ideals of the 1979 Islamic revolution, Ahmadinejad is expected to adopt a tougher position on the two-year-old nuclear negotiations with the EU, analysts and diplomats say.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; eu; france; germany; iaea; iran; iranian; npt; nuclear; nuke; oil; power; president; pressure; revolution; sanction; security; threats; uk; un; unconcerned; unsc; usa; west; wmd

1 posted on 08/07/2005 3:14:16 AM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Iran unconcerned about Security Council referral

They're evil, not stupid.

2 posted on 08/07/2005 3:16:42 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("MON CANARD EST EN FEU!!" -- http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20050620.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

I am sorry for UN


3 posted on 08/07/2005 3:18:11 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Good grief, why?


4 posted on 08/07/2005 3:19:16 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("MON CANARD EST EN FEU!!" -- http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20050620.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

LoL

cause no body cares about them! Even terrorists and rouge nations...


5 posted on 08/07/2005 3:24:31 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Yes, the UN security council is a joke. The comments made regarding unconcern about the council are well founded -- it is a toothless group, unwilling to stand up to its own resolutions.


6 posted on 08/07/2005 3:27:25 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

"As if we care" - Iran


7 posted on 08/07/2005 3:28:12 AM PDT by milemark (Proud to be an infidel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

May be Bolton would force them to do better


8 posted on 08/07/2005 3:30:17 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Perhaps! But don't you know, Bolton is "damaged goods"! HAHA. I'm not sure that any moves to reform the UN will do a bit of good, although Bolton is the right guy to try it. I wish him well.


9 posted on 08/07/2005 3:32:53 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Iran's new president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, at his swearing-in ceremony on Saturday, said Iran would not be intimidated by threats from the West.

A bullet soaked in pig's blood just for you, Mahmoud.

10 posted on 08/07/2005 3:35:43 AM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Why would they worry? The UN will simply find a way to spin this as the fault of Israel and the USA. They might even throw in a "nukes-for-food" program.

Then 5 minutes before the missles nuke European cities, they will sh** their pants.


11 posted on 08/07/2005 5:55:02 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
May be Bolton would force them to do better

Yeah, he could get the UN to issue a really sternly worded resolution.

It's time for us to stop looking to the UN for validation. Long past time, actually.

12 posted on 08/07/2005 5:55:24 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Who WOULD be concerned? Sheesh.


13 posted on 08/07/2005 7:24:09 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I suspect that the Isralies will solve this problem, again.
14 posted on 08/07/2005 7:40:54 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
That would certainly be nice, but what I've been hearing around here is that it won't be as easy as Osirak was, because the Iranians have their facilities far underground.
15 posted on 08/07/2005 9:06:22 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson