Posted on 08/07/2005 12:37:45 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Edited on 08/07/2005 9:27:21 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Nice pic of Shrillary wagging her scolding finger, mullah-style. Hmmm - ever notice on Al-Jazeera videos how those black-rag-heads can't even talk without that index finger jabbing skyward? Similar motives, yes?
They jab only with the right hand. Guess that's 'cause the left is used for personal hygiene.
A think tank? For what?
My bet is they'll be doing the same thing after "thinking" about it.
Deny, deny, deny.....and blame it on the Republicans.
What kind of cosmic imbalance allows people this out of touch with reality to amass the kind of wealth required to fund this crap? It would seem the same level of stupidity that drives this thinking would doom them to financial ruin in the first place.
I'm stumped.
Too Funny.
There are still quite a few really useful ones out there...
You smell.
The term liberal think tank is an oxymoron.
Such Think Tank for the Democrats is useless as they are ethically and intellectually constipated.
Re - e - e - a - ly?
Apologies to Jim Carey.
At the end of the Roman Empire, Rome had some truly amazing buildings with people who had amassed vast sums of wealth. None of this helped, as spiritually they were as barren as a desert.
P.S. Not to knock deserts. I quite like the solitude of such open spaces.
"They deal in fooling people into giving them control over their lives."
Very good observation !
Their idea is to take your money and run your life with it because they can do it better than you because they are superior to you. The trick is how to fool you into thinking this is a good idea so you will vote for them...a tall order, indeed.
I agree and he just signed up on 7-30. Bye-Bye Mr. SC. Back to the DU with you. ZZZZZZZZ
Gee---I thought the liberals already "had" a number of think tanks--a prominent one which quickly comes to mind is the "Brookings Institute".
Well, I'm gonna disagree with you here. The liberals "have" their own idea(s)---but in the final analysis, those ideas always devolve to one---SOCIALISM---which just isn't either popular or workable. But they "do" keep trying it.
Of late, the practice has not been observed, but you really should include someone in the "To:" line when referring to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.