Posted on 08/06/2005 6:33:24 PM PDT by Sam Hill
Notice that she is really from Berkley:
Jul. 12, 2005
Military recruiting targeted by activists
MEASURE WOULD FOCUS ON HIGH SCHOOLS, COLLEGES
By Lisa Leff
Associated Press
Among those standing outside San Francisco City Hall as
campaign organizers prepared to submit 15,000 signatures
they had gathered to put the measure before voters was Cindy
Sheehan, a Berkeley resident whose 24-year-old son, Casey,
died on April 4, 2004, five days after he arrived with his
Army unit in Iraq.
Wiping away tears, Sheehan said that the recruiter who
persuaded her son to join the Army four years earlier
promised Casey he would never see combat and reneged on most
of the signing bonus he was guaranteed.
"I believe if that recruiter had not taken advantage of my
trusting and trustworthy son, he would be alive today,"
Sheehan said. "The kids need to know the truth."
++++++
Apparently this is Cindy's full-time job. She is clearly being paid by someone, probablly George Soros through Moveon.org.
her statements are not seditious. sheehan does not advocate the violent overthrow of the the US Gov't. she merely states what she thinks about the war, its supporters and its causes. so what? q.v. USC TITLE 18,CHAPTER 115 TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES.
Why are there so many people here freaked out by mere words?
don't you mean "statist"
"Why are there so many people here freaked out by mere words?"
Much of the law you just cited is about "mere words."
Sheehan: "I implore you to read Scott Ritter."
With what I'm reading about this mother, it is becoming clearer to me that what she hates most, is herself. Not only does she feel responsible for not being able to stop her son from enlisting...but if she's held these same attitudes (being from Berkeley) her entire life, she may have helped push her son to the career he chose.
Children are often rebellious; and it wouldn't come as a surprise to me if this was Casey's way of showing his independence from his obviously opinionated mother. Only Cindy knows the truth; but if there is any truth in this, her outrage is about what she did...not Bush or anybody else.
Why are you freaked out by Sam Hill's questions? They are, after all, just words.
(Rush Limbaughs' example of illustrating the absurd by being absurd)
I suggest you read some caselaw, or simply look in Black's Law Dictionary. You can indeed provide aid and comfort to the enemy without actually fighting for them in the field. That's EXACTLY what Sheehan is trying to do...she's trying to destroy the American will to fight. That is an action that benefits the enemy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.