Its fairly long but I thought some of you guys would have a good time talking about this one...
How the outside looks at the way we are...
To: All
In this analysis, we can see that the domestic roots of Americas hegemonism are deep and solid. Before the U.S. falls from its hegemonic height, in order to shake its hegemonic thinking, we must eradicate Americas unitary ideology of freedom, change Americas nationalism and conceptual framework, make them believe that there are social systems and life styles in the world that are more admirable than Americas. When hearing foreigners criticism of Americas intervention everywhere, Americans often smugly quip, of course, people all over the world are shouting Yankees, Go home! but they always add, bring me with you. This is the logic of the American hegemony! We can therefore conclude that only when there are no more boisterous assemblies of immigration and visa applicants in front of various American embassies overseas, and only when an outgoing emigration occurs in the United States, will the American hegemonic mentality be extinguished, will the age of multipolarity arrive.
To: maui_hawaii
Before the U.S. falls from its hegemonic height, in order to shake its hegemonic thinking, we must eradicate Americas unitary ideology of freedom, change Americas nationalism and conceptual framework, make them believe that there are social systems and life styles in the world that are more admirable than Americas.
Sounds like Global Alternatives to Capitalism 101.
Are you sure this isn't a college course?
Too late for the cadres, just like it's too late for jihad,
they couldn't wait until we were totally indoctrinated.
Now it will cost them.
Funny though, the Chinese have their own hegemonic plan
but their rigid belief structure won't be able to seal the
cracks that come with such expansion.
8 posted on
08/06/2005 4:36:32 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
9 posted on
08/06/2005 4:40:08 PM PDT by
Captainpaintball
(Maybe we DON'T wish to keep our republic, Mr. Franklin!!!)
To: maui_hawaii
taking names of those who give aid and comfort to the enemy...Schlesinger, McNamara
10 posted on
08/06/2005 4:41:06 PM PDT by
gusopol3
To: maui_hawaii
Thanks for posting! One of the fascinating aspects of this involve the idealogical blinders of the author. On the one hand he shows some signs of understanding the American individualistic ethos, while on the other he embraces the notion that mucking around with the American psyche could somehow advance the Chinese agenda. All in all a fascinating post.
14 posted on
08/06/2005 5:10:49 PM PDT by
Buzwardo
To: maui_hawaii
About the only people I see ever use the word "hegemony" are the Red Chinese.
Here's the thing Mr. Wang -- your government is ripping you off. And they are ripping your mother off, your father off, your sister off and your brother off along with your aunts, uncles, neighbors and everything you hold dear.
Unless, of course, you happen to be tight with the in crowd, then you have it pretty good.
But you sure don't see a whole lot of us Americans wanting to emigrate to the PRC, do you? Think about it.
15 posted on
08/06/2005 5:17:02 PM PDT by
Tribune7
To: maui_hawaii
16 posted on
08/06/2005 5:29:25 PM PDT by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
To: Jeff Head
To: maui_hawaii
we must eradicate Americas unitary ideology of freedom, change Americas nationalism and conceptual framework, make them believe that there are social systems and life styles in the world that are more admirable than Americas. Good luck.
This is a country that could never, ever feed its people, suffering from periodic famines that killed millions. Those are the "social systems and lifestyles" that prevailed in China...until, in the last 20 years, they began trading with the United States.
25 posted on
08/06/2005 10:01:15 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
("Liberty is not a suicide pact."--Fouad Ajami)
To: maui_hawaii
Fascinating article. Lots of truth to consider and the conclusion is rather mindblowing.
To: ForGod'sSake
Here's another interesting read....try this one out...
To: headsonpikes; nopardons; Peach; Howlin; lentulusgracchus; backhoe; Alberta's Child; Coop; Huck; ...
Occasionally a serious piece is posted on FR. This is very interesting.
To: maui_hawaii
The author assumes that a multipolar global system is superior to a benevolent quasi-hegemon. I'm not sure this is the case (despite my firm belief that a concentration of power is inherently dangerous, in direct proportion to the size and scope of that power)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson