In a section of the memo headed The News/Opinion Divide, Keller conceded that "even sophisticated readers of The New York Times sometimes find it hard to distinguish between news coverage and commentary in our pages." That's because the every page of the paper is full of lies!
Critics have charged for years that the Times newsroom is out of step with the majority of the country because the editorial staff represents but a small atypical slice of American demographics and opinion.
I'll go a step further, the Old Gray Whore is actually on the side of America's enemies.
1 posted on
08/06/2005 2:11:29 PM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: wagglebee
"Should Conservatives Give The New York Times a Break?"
NO
To: wagglebee
3 posted on
08/06/2005 2:14:56 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(Liberals: Too stupid to realize Dick Cheney is the real Dark Lord.)
To: wagglebee
The first step is admitting you have a problem.
4 posted on
08/06/2005 2:15:18 PM PDT by
Originalist
(Clarence Thomas for Chief Justice!!)
To: wagglebee
"Should Conservatives Give The New York Times a Break?"Certainly.
Both legs and a shoulder should do nicely.
5 posted on
08/06/2005 2:15:36 PM PDT by
SAJ
(`)
To: wagglebee
What an absurd article.
It plays into the conservative "Why can't we all just get along?" attitude.
The NYT is liberal because the Sulzberger family which OWNS the NTY is. It will continue to be so, until the publisher "Pinch" Sulzberger changes his views.
To believe otherwise, is to be naive.
6 posted on
08/06/2005 2:15:53 PM PDT by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: wagglebee
It wouldnt hurt, either, for Times critics on the Right to show some patience because changing an entrenched culture like that of a newsroom isnt going to happen overnight, nor will it occur without some unexpectedly abbreviated careers and a surplus of discontent bred by an inability or refusal to change. It certainly would change overnight if half of the current staff was fired and replaced with conservatives.
8 posted on
08/06/2005 2:16:21 PM PDT by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: wagglebee
9 posted on
08/06/2005 2:17:30 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Choose LIFE. Circumcision = Barbarism. It's HIS body; what about HIS right to choose?)
To: wagglebee
I find their newfound honesty in self-evaluation refreshing.
however, they shall have no "break" from me until they earn it.
talk is cheap.
12 posted on
08/06/2005 2:18:15 PM PDT by
King Prout
(and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
To: wagglebee
"I'll go a step further, the Old Gray Whore is actually on the side of America's enemies."
Good call!
To: wagglebee
Sure. I'll cut them some slack. Give Ben Stein, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter just half of the opinion page and we've got a deal. :o)
To: wagglebee
Personally I think all "big media" people should do an internship in small towns in flyover country. Their attitudes would change if the had to face the people they insult on a regular basis.
15 posted on
08/06/2005 2:19:37 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: wagglebee
It wouldnt hurt, either, for Times critics on the Right to show some patience because changing an entrenched culture like that of a newsroom isnt going to happen overnightSorry, I refuse to be patient with these jerks. I'd like to see every single one of them in the unemployment line.
To: wagglebee
As everybody knows, making speeches (or writing memos) about improvements is frequently considered as an equivalent substitute for the improvements themselves. Thus no credit should be given, or still more patience shown, until the actual improvements have been made. And these would have to include a wholesale importation of right-wingers, both as journalists and as editorial staff, for their existing lefties are not correctable, unless with a 2x4.
17 posted on
08/06/2005 2:21:08 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: wagglebee
I pray for the day when this evil lying deceitful propaganda rag has a circulation has collapsed to zero.
To: wagglebee
I'll give them a break. They can have this broken left leg. Past that, no, they can get no other breaks from me.
19 posted on
08/06/2005 2:22:30 PM PDT by
rdb3
(I once had a handle on life, but I broke it.)
To: wagglebee
How about instead we offer Keller encouragement and praise for fessing up to serious problems of longstanding and for putting his own career and prestige on the line in making the effort to deal with those problems in a systematic and reasonable way? On their Op-Ed page recently they've hired a neoconservative (David Brooks) and a libertarian conservative (John Tierney). But they still can't bring themselves to hire a social conservative. That is the most important wing of revitalized modern American conservatism, but it is the one that to NYT readers and writers sounds most like it comes from outer space. Reaching out will never be serious until they hire writers who, for example, are arguing passionately to Times readers that abortion on demand is wrong.
Globalization and Getting Along.
21 posted on
08/06/2005 2:23:33 PM PDT by
untenured
(http://futureuncertain.blogspot.com)
To: wagglebee
Should conservatives give the New York Times a break? Absolutely not. Let the free market decide. The New York Post is increasing circulation, while the NY Times is in decline. They will either learn or continue to lose market share. That's the perfect way to let this play out. Same thing with the Washington Post and the Boston Globe.
22 posted on
08/06/2005 2:24:26 PM PDT by
DuckFan4ever
(Why doesn't everyone hate Hillary as much as I do?)
To: wagglebee
For the damage they do to this country on a daily basis? Propagandists. NEVER!
23 posted on
08/06/2005 2:26:28 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: wagglebee
He also warned about the misuse of [the phrase] religious fundamentalists to describe religious conservatives.
"Guys, I've been thinkin' this over. Let's stop using the N-Word and let's come up with a brand new slur."
24 posted on
08/06/2005 2:26:31 PM PDT by
Polybius
To: wagglebee
The NYT is now running a national ad campaign to try and hock their paper, cause apparently, they want it to be "America's paper", they're even running ads here.
If they want it to be "America's paper" then they need to start hiring conservative journalists to their staff to balance out the liberal bias that it currently has
26 posted on
08/06/2005 2:28:20 PM PDT by
AzaleaCity5691
(The enemy lies in the heart of Gadsden)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson