Bush Takes More Vacations, But Clinton Was Away Longer, And Spent Much More (3 Trips Cost $72 mil)

United States Senate Republican Policy Committee ^ | 9/29/1999

[John Robertson]

"The Associated Press story included a candid quote from presidential counselor Doug Sosnik: "This is a guy that has never met an idea that he doesn't like, never met a person who's not interesting and never found a place in the world he wouldn't want to go." As the GAO study shows, he also never met a tab he didn't want the taxpayer to pick up."

[Condor51]

The only reason Willard & his 'missus' didn't take more "vacations" is because they didn't own a freaking house! Everywhere they went, they had to mooch off the owner.

Hell even when slick was chasing babes in FL while drunk (or stoned on Coke) he had to do it in Greg Norman's house. Then the hick breaks his freaking leg (or whatever) and WE had to pay for his medical bills - the a$$hole.

[mewzilla]

So let's see, what would the nation rather have? A God-fearing, honorable man who can lead the Free World just as easily from Crawford as he can from that cesspool in DC? Or a lying degenerate who, while spending his time in our nation's capital, allows numerous terrorist attacks to take place, and leaves the terrorists emboldened and unmolested while he diddles his way through the female population?

Gee, it's a real tough choice.

NOT.

[N. Theknow]

Clinton wasn't always working when he was in the Oval Office.

What is the definition of "job?"