You lied when you posted a message to judgeand jury stating the sub-contractor "admitted the illegal were there." Your arguments are apparently so weak that you must resort to making up facts.
The left-wing, pro-Democrat Denver Post has never identified the illegal aliens that allegedly worked at Cong. Tancredo's house. Would a left-wing, pro-Democrat newspaper ever lie about a Republican? That could never happen.
Has the Denver Post ever produced any documentation to support its claim that illegal aliens worked at Cong. Tancredo's house? Is the word of two (2) illegal aliens the only "proof" the Denver Post has?
The September 20, 2002, Rocky Mountain News article that I produced contains no quotes from Cong. Tancredo in which he admits that illegal aliens worked on his home. The floor speech referred to in the World Net Daily article occurred on September 18, 2004.
According to a story in the Septebmer 19, 2002, edition of the left-wing, pro-Democrat Denver Post, "In a fiery speech on the House floor late Wednesday, Tancredo said he didn't know whether the drywallers were legal immigrants."
Here is a link to an October 13, 2004, about attack ads being used by his Democratic opponent: http://rockymountainnews.com/drmn/election/article/0,1299,DRMN_36_3253360,00.html . The article says the contractor denied the allegation that illegal immigrants worked on Cong. Tancredo's home. It mentions nothing about an admission by Cong. Tancredo that illegal aliens worked on his house.
The WorldNetDaily article does not contain a quote from Cong. Tancredo's speech. If there is any media source (even The Denver Post) that has ever quoted Cong. Tancredo as admitting that illegal aliens worked on his home, please state what that source. I do not believe any such source exists.
As to this comment by you, "As for contacting whomever, You will take care of it. It is of little relevance to him because he, like you, is in a seperate reality," I must ask what are you referring to?
I meant to say "please state what that source is."
I know you think that you can actually influence(spin) the world and cleanse Tanc with your replies on a thread at website that is a gathering place for hardliners and kooks.
The problem with that approach is that it is irrelevant. Your proof is irrelevant.
Normally references to events such as this drop from view with time, but this is not the case with Tanc's illegal employees. Im sure that you noted that a Google search brings many hits related to the incident, even after two years.
The incident is not going away.
You understand, this is not all bad for Tanc. Bad press is better than no press. And Tanc's big problem is no press.
If he expects to fill Pat B's shoes, he will have to say some extreme things to get people to notice him.. Even then, he has no chance of succeeding Pat B.
Tanc's problem is that he has no presence. He comes off wishy-washy, almost feminine. You may have seen his recent appearance on CNN when Zogby chewed him up. Tanc was backpeddling like a crawfish. Can you imagine what he would be like sub-ing for Pat on McLaughlin. Eleanor Clift would kick his ass.
You and Tanc should thank me/pay me money for keeping him alive, even if its only a thread at FR.
Good points "arnie"!!