Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay
I think the manufacturer should be able to have input in design changes without being blamed and sued.

Like we agree, kids are mischievous. I don't think a company should be sued because of that.
56 posted on 08/05/2005 11:56:34 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia

I agree, but I also recognize that like it or not, companies have a long tried and true history of only doing things when economics or laws FORCE them to... the age of the Christian CEO is long over (if it ever existed).

Lawsuits cost money, whether they are right or wrong.... without the threat of having to deal with lawsuits complacency and a base depreciation on human life occurs by companies... what is a preventable death if there is no cost to us?

I don't believe the company will be found guilty in this case, although if the washer did indeed malfunction and start without money in it, that's a flaw that certainly was a contributing factor.

Hopefully, this little girls death will, whether we agree on the lawsuit or not, bring about changes to these machines so that no ones child winds up dying preventably in them in the future.

I know as a general rule of thumb, engineers should assume that any device that closes and latches that the possibility that a person could become trapped inside.


64 posted on 08/05/2005 12:33:55 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson