That is quite different from what??
BTW, your threats are laughable. I heard Rush clearly saying "questions need to be asked".
Which all conservatives have agreed from the start. Tell me how you get from that to Souter. This should be fascinating.
That is quite different from what??
:;sigh:: The Constitutionality of a case is not the same matter as what a person's involvement, limited as was, is in a case. To tie a dissent by Scalia on a constitutional matter into an attempt to make it a dissent On Roberts is ridiculous.
By same token, when Roberts dissented from Olsen (rightly) in another case that calls Olsen's cred into question? Absurd. And at least in the dissent from Olsen, Olsen was tied strongly to the case.
Questions should be asked, they always are of these nominees. I don't see why a stealth nominee like Roberts should be the first SCOTUS nominee to go unquestioned.