[Soul Seeker]

I heard Rush clearly saying "questions need to be asked"

Which all conservatives have agreed from the start. Tell me how you get from that to Souter. This should be fascinating.

That is quite different from what??

:;sigh:: The Constitutionality of a case is not the same matter as what a person's involvement, limited as was, is in a case. To tie a dissent by Scalia on a constitutional matter into an attempt to make it a dissent On Roberts is ridiculous.

By same token, when Roberts dissented from Olsen (rightly) in another case that calls Olsen's cred into question? Absurd. And at least in the dissent from Olsen, Olsen was tied strongly to the case.

[k2blader]

Where did I say "Souter" on thsi thread??

You're the one who brought up Souter.

The Constitutionality of a case is not the same matter as what a person's involvement, limited as was, is in a case.

Ridiculous.

Does Roberts agree with the court's decision or not??

Since he worked on behalf of an anti-constitutional client, the question is more than appropriate.

[k2blader]

For the last time, please stop lying about my saying anything about Souter.