Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: petconservative

I think the real motivation for attacking Mother Theresa is that she was Pro Life. That abortion culture has never forgiven her. When she accepted the Nobel Prize, she gave an uncompromising Pro Life pitch.

If you join an order where you take a vow of poverty, why complain about the lack of luxuries?


4 posted on 08/05/2005 8:19:59 AM PDT by Monterrosa-24 (Where is our Charles Martel? Who will be our hammer against Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Monterrosa-24

Wouldn't surprise me a bit.
Remember a few years back when Mother Theresa was speaking to a group that included the Clintons and Gores? She didn't mince words about abortion. For some reason, the aforementioned slimes found it necessary to inspect the tops of their shoes during most of that speech. I loved it.


12 posted on 08/05/2005 8:25:14 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Suffering fools reluctantly since 1947.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Monterrosa-24; petconservative
The donations rolled in and were deposited in the bank, but they had no effect on our ascetic lives and very little effect on the lives of the poor we were trying to help. We lived a simple life, bare of all superfluities. We had three sets of clothes, which we mended until the material was too rotten to patch anymore. We washed our own clothes by hand. The never-ending piles of sheets and towels from our night shelter for the homeless we washed by hand, too. Our bathing was accomplished with only one bucket of water. Dental and medical checkups were seen as an unnecessary luxury. Mother was very concerned that we preserve our spirit of poverty. Spending money would destroy that poverty. She seemed obsessed with using only the simplest of means for our work.

She missed the point entirely and apparently her head was turned by the money. Mother Teresa wanted the sisters to live like the very poor of India that they helped, and it seems they do.

As a Missionary of Charity, I was assigned to record donations and write the thank-you letters. The money arrived at a frantic rate. The mail carrier often delivered the letters in sacks. We wrote receipts for checks of $50,000 and more on a regular basis.

Sounds like her head was turned by the money.

She became disillusioned and left the community. Only speaking out now long after Mother Teresa's death and shortly after Pope John Paul II's passing, he being a great friend of hers and admirer of her work. How cowardly. Truly someone who doesn't get it. And to slander Mother and her sisters so long after her death, at a time of increased violence against the Christians of India, wow. She has added to the misery of the poor Christians, and other poor, of India. Pathetic.

17 posted on 08/05/2005 8:30:37 AM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Monterrosa-24; petconservative
I think the real motivation for attacking Mother Theresa is that she was Pro Life. That abortion culture has never forgiven her. When she accepted the Nobel Prize, she gave an uncompromising Pro Life pitch.

Yes, I think that is at the root of it. The author mentions 'helping' women. Did she mean helping them to abortions and contraception while they starved? And so now they exact their vengeance at a time when none can defend, as though they need defending, their words and actions. Cowards. Heinous.

The donations rolled in and were deposited in the bank, but they had no effect on our ascetic lives and very little effect on the lives of the poor we were trying to help. We lived a simple life, bare of all superfluities. We had three sets of clothes, which we mended until the material was too rotten to patch anymore. We washed our own clothes by hand. The never-ending piles of sheets and towels from our night shelter for the homeless we washed by hand, too. Our bathing was accomplished with only one bucket of water. Dental and medical checkups were seen as an unnecessary luxury. Mother was very concerned that we preserve our spirit of poverty. Spending money would destroy that poverty. She seemed obsessed with using only the simplest of means for our work.

She missed the point entirely and apparently her head was turned by the money. Mother Teresa wanted the sisters to live like the very poor of India that they helped, and it seems they do.

As a Missionary of Charity, I was assigned to record donations and write the thank-you letters. The money arrived at a frantic rate. The mail carrier often delivered the letters in sacks. We wrote receipts for checks of $50,000 and more on a regular basis.

Sounds like her head was turned by the money.

She became disillusioned and left the community. Only speaking out now long after Mother Teresa's death and shortly after Pope John Paul II's passing, he being a great friend of hers and admirer of her work. How cowardly. Truly someone who doesn't get it. And to slander Mother and her sisters so long after her death, at a time of increased violence against the Christians of India, wow. She has added to the misery of the poor Christians, and other poor, of India. Pathetic.

21 posted on 08/05/2005 8:33:22 AM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Monterrosa-24
If you join an order where you take a vow of poverty, why complain about the lack of luxuries?

Right! "Luxuries" such as basic medical and dental care. I'm glad I'm not your spouse.

29 posted on 08/05/2005 8:37:54 AM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Monterrosa-24

If you join an order where you take a vow of poverty, why complain about the lack of luxuries?

Reminds me of the guy who joined the army and then sued when he was going to be sent to war, because 'when he signed up he never intended to go to war'. The world is full of nut cases.


61 posted on 08/05/2005 9:20:48 AM PDT by hardworking (Save money on redecorating the White House - elect Hillary and maybe she'll bring the stuff back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Monterrosa-24

Even the Catholic Church at one point said that Mother Theresa was possessed, so what do you say about that?
I think that there is a danger in trying to follow one person, and not God, because humans do err.


68 posted on 08/05/2005 11:02:54 AM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson