Posted on 08/04/2005 10:28:07 AM PDT by cogitator
So an ice age ends, and 10K years later an immense ice shelf becomes weak enough to collapse. This seems quite believable; the implication that humans are somehow at fault for this is a serious stretch--especially since they appear to be clearly admitting that the same shelf has collapsed before.
Or, to be more precise, since hoards of science teams have been roaming the antartic on highly polluting snowmobiles and burning diesel fuel and fuel oil to keep warm in their huts.
It's more likely that the sediment cores used to infer the status of the ice shelf don't go back a lot further than 10,000 years, hence the status of the ice shelf was unknown. (During the last glacial epoch, it was probably there.)
It's Jane Fonda's fault.
It's the fault of the dinosaur leader, Bushgar.
This is so stupid. IMO we are heading for another Ice Age. It doesn't take a scientist to realize that when the polar ice caps start to melt, glaciers from it will start floating southward and bring cooler air with them. Of course this has been talked about for long time by geographers for a long time. It just doesn't get the attention that global warming gets. My Geography teacher in college talked, 10 years ago, about believing another ice age was coming. I would believe him before I believe some Media scientist.
Didn't Steyn call Luxembourg the city pretending to be a country?
"Been tried before (with the middle east as a destination) and it didn't work. It'll melt long before it gets there."
The Holocene has been remarkably stable, climate-wise. The rapid collapse of a shelf that has existed for 10,000 years is therefore a notable event. If the shelf was more "delicate", i.e., more responsive to small temperature changes, then the cores would have shown a repeating pattern of collapse and regrowth.
Since Antarctica is at the pole, does the 14,000 year precession cycle have anything to do with which parts of the continent get direct sunlight at what angles for how long?
-PJ
Did you miss the admission that the shelf has been thinning fairly steadily for the entire Halocene period?
Ever notice how no matter what the criteria, we're "due for another" now?
A supervolcano eruption (in Yellowstone).
Another ice age.
A warming trend brought on by global warming.
An earthquake in California.
An asteroid impact.
And the list goes on. If all these things are true, we're really screwed I'd say!
I don't know of another animal species that is involved in clear-cutting, can you "male" commentators enlighten me?
WTF does her gender have to do with it?
Coincides with the introduction of the SUV and man's use of fossil fuels.
I am unfamiliar with the use of the term "watermelon" in this context. Can you explain?
>>>"I am unfamiliar with the use of the term "watermelon" in this context. Can you explain?"<<<
GOOGLE is your friend, I don't even know you.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/science/cold-science/2002-01-18-wais-thicker.htm
http://www.rednova.com/news/science/151122/report_antarctic_ice_sheet_thickening/
*******************************************
The sky is falling!
classic statistic fudging! - avg temperatures for the Antarctic continent AS A WHOLE are significantly down durning this same 50 years. This shows how biased this source is that they feel the need to cherry pick just the Antarctic peninsula data, which is the only region (and a small region, comparitively) on the Antarctic continent showing a rise in temps.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.