Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: solitas

I don't trust law-enforcement personnel to begin with, and I'm shocked to see so many so-called "conservatives" here who are such ardent supporters of the concept that an intrusive "nanny state" is an acceptable approach to this problem.


31 posted on 08/04/2005 8:18:27 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
I don't trust law-enforcement personnel to begin with, and I'm shocked to see so many so-called "conservatives" here who are such ardent supporters of the concept that an intrusive "nanny state" is an acceptable approach to this problem.

I'm not crazy about trusting them too much either; but I'm less crazy about getting assaulted in a situation where I cannot perforce defend myself to the same degree as the antagonist.

If the government will NOT allow me to be armed in certain situations (planes, trains, etc.) to protect Myself and Mine then they damned well BETTER be doing THAT themselves.

The rest of the time: I'll watch out for myself, defend myself as is necessary, and let the government take care of any subsequent prosecution(s) - I am my own first-responder.

41 posted on 08/04/2005 8:38:01 AM PDT by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson