To: jwalsh07
believe what you want to believe...
personally, the guy is able to put aside his personal feelings for a client. That also means he probably puts aside his political leanings for the Constitution.
One generally translates to the other. It certainly did in the cases of Thomas and Scalia.
49 posted on
08/04/2005 7:56:50 AM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(When Judge Roberts is confirmed, FR will be EXTREMELY funny that day...Get your PROZAC here!!!)
To: MikeinIraq
Do you think a conservative Justice should support Romer?
57 posted on
08/04/2005 7:59:02 AM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: MikeinIraq
personally, the guy is able to put aside his personal feelings for a client.
Pro-bono indicates that he volunteered to work on this case. What kind of lawyer seeks out a sodomy "rights" case to work on for free? You're mischaracterizing this, I'm afraid.
66 posted on
08/04/2005 8:04:12 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
To: MikeinIraq
One doesn't work pro bone (for nothing) if he or she doesn't believe in the cause. Keep drinking the Kool Aid. Unbelievable.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson