[MikefromOhio]

and his past work is an indication of ANYTHING that he may rule on???

It doesn't matter what argument I bring to the table, you have already made your mind up.

So I said whatever man.

Now remember, I have Prozac, 2 for 1 sale is ongoing...

[Antoninus]

It doesn't matter what argument I bring to the table, you have already made your mind up.

No, I haven't made up my mind. From the beginning, I've had a "wait-and-see" attitude on Roberts. Same as I'd had on Souter. I want to believe that Roberts is the next Scalia or Thomas, but I'm waiting for the evidence to come in. The fact that this guy doesn't have a paper trail (like Souter), has been worrying from day one. This news is a further bad sign.

If you can't see that, then I suggest you think about taking off the rose-colored glasses at some point.

[RGSpincich]

He returned to Hogan & Hartson in 1993. At the time of his confirmation, Judge Roberts was the senior partner in charge of Hogan & Hartson's appellate practice.

The guy was doing his job. He was obligated to oversee all work done in the appellate division.