Scientific findings, as published in all relevant mainstream journals and literature, also support macroevolution.
A small sample: 29 Evidences for Macroevolution
It is considered the mainstream scientific theory of origins for good reasons. Contrary to what many believe, there is no real serious debate among scientists as to whether or not evolution is correct (for the very reason that is so well-supported by evidence). There are debates as to how specific aspects of evolution work, but no real significant dissent as to the effectiveness of the overall theory.
It is not as if those evidences are beyond question or critique. The evidence will always fit the working assumptions of the observer. You assume the words of science unguided by biblical texts are true, and make your bed accordingly. But you err in expecting the children of every classroom to buy your faith.