Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Methodist Bishop Kammerer Invents Church Law, Cans Pastor, Demands Secrecy
United Methodist News Service ^ | 26 July 2005 | UMNS, Linda Green

Posted on 08/04/2005 6:24:09 AM PDT by mbarker12474

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Issues other than homosexuality itself are:

- membership vs participation - discretion power over membership - who decides membership - power of Bishop, District Superintendent, Clergy - power of laity - secrecy of Va Conference of the UMC - test of profession of faith

Mike B.

1 posted on 08/04/2005 6:24:10 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

"The Bible says homosexuality is a sin. Now everybody sins, but we like to think that everybody who is a member of the United Methodist Church is attempting to repent of their sins."

I agree, he must immediately repent and live a "straight" lifestyle" and if not faced the membership and removed from the membership. Once the door is open the flood begins.


2 posted on 08/04/2005 6:27:30 AM PDT by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apple Blossom

ping


3 posted on 08/04/2005 6:29:41 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's code and found a terrorist message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad

Unfortunately, we already allow open adulterers into membership so barring homosexuals is rather foolish.


4 posted on 08/04/2005 6:30:34 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474
Why would he go back, he would be a hypocrite. The Methodist Church is becoming secular and irrelevant
5 posted on 08/04/2005 6:31:15 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

Is there a way that we can help this Pastor regain his position?


6 posted on 08/04/2005 6:34:45 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Conservatism: doing what is right instead of what is easy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Unfortunately, we already allow open adulterers into membership so barring homosexuals is rather foolish.

You hit the nail on the head.

7 posted on 08/04/2005 6:38:29 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Unfortunately, we already allow open adulterers into membership so barring homosexuals is rather foolish.



I would prefer holding adulterers accountable rather than lowering the bar.


8 posted on 08/04/2005 6:38:57 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

I like this answer. The church is full of sinners but homosexuals openly defy God's word and have no sense of repentance. I would venture to say when I sin, and others, we try to gain forgiveness and stop the sinful behavior.


9 posted on 08/04/2005 6:42:41 AM PDT by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

We had a mini-scandal here in Houston a few years ago when Rice University football coach Ken Hatfield said he would be uncomfortable having homosexuals on the football team. He was deeply religious, and did not want such sinners on his team. However, I seriously doubt that his straight players were living celibate lives (when I was in college, football players usually had entourages of girls around them).


10 posted on 08/04/2005 6:45:24 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ("...on Earth, as it is in TEXAS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
I would prefer holding adulterers accountable rather than lowering the bar.

As would I.

11 posted on 08/04/2005 6:54:30 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Good point. We tend to treat sin as if there is a point system.


12 posted on 08/04/2005 6:55:07 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

What else shall we ban people for.
Working on the Sabbath?
Adultery?
Owning a Graven Image?
Eating Unclean Meat?
Not having Battlements on your roof?


13 posted on 08/04/2005 7:23:10 AM PDT by The_Repugnant_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy; PeterPrinciple; starfish923; One Proud Dad
Unfortunately, we already allow open adulterers into membership so barring homosexuals is rather foolish.

"Open adulterers?" Do you mean they bring their mistresses to church instead of or along with their wives? I guess fornicators and "polyamorous" types are welcome and openly express their non-Christian behaviors as well?

I'm glad I attend a Christian Church where all sinners are actually called to repent and follow Christ instead of one like this where such nonsense is openly embraced.

14 posted on 08/04/2005 7:35:01 AM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Ping


15 posted on 08/04/2005 7:39:49 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbarker12474

Apostasy marches on... its so biblical.. i.e. supposed to happen..


16 posted on 08/04/2005 7:41:29 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

Nah. People living together. The Bible describes adultery as "sex outside a marriage" (See the woman at the well).


17 posted on 08/04/2005 7:49:11 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

It does make me sad. Our pastor is hinting about a coup so to speak in the Methodist Church if the liberal faction doesn't straighten up. I can only say I am glad I live in a small, Bible Belt region and our church doesn't contend with these issues yet.


18 posted on 08/04/2005 7:49:19 AM PDT by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

This is the same article reposted. I've no problem with that.

The truth is that the District Superintendent who says that homosexuals are denied ordination but are required to be brought into membership is lying.

The very biblical church rules state that "homosexuality is INCOMPATIBLE with Christian teaching." It also says that homosexuals "MAY" be received into church membership. The intent of the two is to say that REPENTENT, NON-PRACTICING homosexuals are eligible for membership.

We will simply have to address that specific wording at the next General Conference in May of 2008.

What is obvious here is that the bishop intentionally used the associate to undermine the senior pastor. It was the associate who turned the senior pastor in.

Does "Judas" ring a bell?


19 posted on 08/04/2005 7:59:21 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Another article about the Methodist minister placed on involutary leave ("fired") for not allowing a homosexual to become a church member. Keep in mind the man (I assume it was a man) was perfectly welcome to attend church functions; just not become an official member.

Might as well just give up on denominations like these and have home churches like in China.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.

Note: A house of worship which institutionalizes sin as being something to assist, glorify, celebrate and practically speaking, mandate, is akin to decorating a dead body with lipstick, earrings, and nail polish. It's still dead.


20 posted on 08/04/2005 8:02:43 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson