To: ConsentofGoverned
"Housing is a basic human need and should be free to all who respect the property of a rental owner."
So you don't think a private property owner should be able to refuse to rent to a homosexual "couple".
I disagree.
Many communities designate their properties as "single-family" residences - which prohibits such a living arrangement (along with others).
This comes down to community standards. We do not need federal laws that open property owners to legal attacks for exercising their rights of property ownership and free association.
Applying the same logic, even pedophiles have the "basic human need" of a place to live. Well that doesn't mean it is my job to provide for their needs.
To: unlearner
"Many communities designate their properties as "single-family" residences - which prohibits such a living arrangement (along with others)."
the above is OK with me..I am just saying why not use that law and apply it equally to all..seems it would restrict all who did not rent as a single family, a law applied to all is OK with me. we do not disagree..
20 posted on
08/04/2005 5:57:30 AM PDT by
ConsentofGoverned
(A sucker is born every minute..what are the voters?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson