Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConsentofGoverned
"Housing is a basic human need and should be free to all who respect the property of a rental owner."

So you don't think a private property owner should be able to refuse to rent to a homosexual "couple".

I disagree.

Many communities designate their properties as "single-family" residences - which prohibits such a living arrangement (along with others).

This comes down to community standards. We do not need federal laws that open property owners to legal attacks for exercising their rights of property ownership and free association.

Applying the same logic, even pedophiles have the "basic human need" of a place to live. Well that doesn't mean it is my job to provide for their needs.
19 posted on 08/04/2005 5:49:25 AM PDT by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: unlearner

"Many communities designate their properties as "single-family" residences - which prohibits such a living arrangement (along with others)."

the above is OK with me..I am just saying why not use that law and apply it equally to all..seems it would restrict all who did not rent as a single family, a law applied to all is OK with me. we do not disagree..


20 posted on 08/04/2005 5:57:30 AM PDT by ConsentofGoverned (A sucker is born every minute..what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson