To: unlearner
"Many communities designate their properties as "single-family" residences - which prohibits such a living arrangement (along with others)."
the above is OK with me..I am just saying why not use that law and apply it equally to all..seems it would restrict all who did not rent as a single family, a law applied to all is OK with me. we do not disagree..
20 posted on
08/04/2005 5:57:30 AM PDT by
ConsentofGoverned
(A sucker is born every minute..what are the voters?)
To: ConsentofGoverned
This issue is portrayed as somehow homosexuals are just minding their own business, and Christians are on a witch hunt, spying on them and discover their homosexuality. Then the mean Christians persecute these innocent homosexuals.
The reality is homosexual militants are waging war against Christian communities that say homosexuality is wrong. They want to create legal precedents so they can attack Christian communities through the law.
Once they have special legal status as a homosexual, they can flaunt it (which they do). Then when someone "discriminates", they can sue.
They want more than to just have a place to live. They want to evangelize their behavior. They want to be your children's teachers at school. They want to adopt children. They want their agenda to be promoted through public education of children.
If you don't like it, they have laws to go after you. In Canada, expressing opposition to homosexuality can cause major legal problems. It might even be considered "hate speech". This is what they want here.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson