Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc

If the someone who wanted to be left alone really wanted to be left alone, they shouldn't have opened fire on a federal reservation. They all but handed Lincoln all the justification he needed to present the fencesitters. The right of secession was a point which warranted some constitutional debate, but nothing in the Constitution could be read as permitting the attack on Fort Sumter. It was federal property.


8 posted on 08/04/2005 12:42:56 AM PDT by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: American Soldier

"If the someone who wanted to be left alone really wanted to be left alone, they shouldn't have opened fire on a federal reservation."

Well, if you want to take it to that level, according to accepted international law, Lincoln committed the first act of war when he undertook to reinforce Sumpter.

It there was a right to secede, and there was, then Lincoln was obliged to get his troops off.


10 posted on 08/04/2005 1:29:56 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: American Soldier

Being a Southernor and STILL a staunch secessionist, I have to applaud what you said here.


37 posted on 08/04/2005 5:32:53 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson