Skip to comments.
Fired CIA agent seeks FBI probe of WMD intelligence
Reuters ^
| 8-1-05
Posted on 08/03/2005 9:41:19 PM PDT by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Does the FBI actually investigate the CIA??
More evidence of the turf war and enmity between the FBI and CIA ....they're so averse to working together to protect our/their own country... staggering.
1
posted on
08/03/2005 9:41:21 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
To: Sam Hill; cyncooper; Mo1; Howlin; Lancey Howard
PING!
former agent who worked as a Near Eastern specialist on counter-proliferation issues
Was this Plame's department?
2
posted on
08/03/2005 9:44:10 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(CURB POLLUTION; SAVE ENERGY: Show a lie-detection meter for every Democrat interview.)
To: STARWISE
"One was the WMD intelligence the former agent says he was asked to change in 2000"
It will be interesting to see whether there's anything to this (if the public ever gets to know), but judging from the Wilson/Plame/Larry Johnson/Ray McGovern types who have been on a crusade, it's more likely the agent was one of that crowd and is squeezing more sour grapes. Note that the date of the first issue is 2000, when the Stainmeister was still president, so watch how the presstitutes will write all their stories as though this is something the BUSH administration did to a poor downtrodden whistleblower...... Still, I suspect that a lot of debates within the intel community can be grossly distorted, e.g., any piece of intel that might SEEM to indicate Iraq had abandoned its nuclear or other WMD program might also be seen as disinformation from the Iraqi regime. Let's remember (the media won't) that Saddam and his cronies learned from KGB masters of disinformation, so any CIA analyst who too easily regards as credible a piece of intel which tells a story Saddam wants told may be a dupe......
3
posted on
08/03/2005 9:49:04 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: STARWISE
4
posted on
08/03/2005 9:52:34 PM PDT
by
dila813
To: Enchante
Crazy thought: it's almost like they're giving Sadaam
pointers for his trial!! "See? I didn't have no WMD."
5
posted on
08/03/2005 9:53:43 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(CURB POLLUTION; SAVE ENERGY: Show a lie-detection meter for every Democrat interview.)
To: Shermy; Fedora
6
posted on
08/03/2005 9:58:02 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: Shermy; Wolfstar; Fedora; cyncooper
The CIA counter-proliferation nexus grows.
7
posted on
08/03/2005 9:58:36 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: dila813
Why? You'd prefer the President continue to get the same lousy info that the CIA has spewed forth for at least 10 years?
To: STARWISE
Plame worked for Alan Foley who headed WINPAC- aka "Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and Arms Control" center.
9
posted on
08/03/2005 10:06:06 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: STARWISE
Just another bitter Clinton crony looking for a job.
To: piasa; Sam Hill; All
11
posted on
08/03/2005 10:10:01 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(CURB POLLUTION; SAVE ENERGY: Show a lie-detection meter for every Democrat interview.)
To: piasa
Different dept. than Plame?
12
posted on
08/03/2005 10:11:08 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(CURB POLLUTION; SAVE ENERGY: Show a lie-detection meter for every Democrat interview.)
To: Enchante
Note that the date of the first issue is 2000, when the Stainmeister was still presidentYep. The New York Times will surely never connect those dots for public consumption.
To: STARWISE
Plame would be in a subdepartment of Foley's- he was the boss of about 500 people. I don't know the name of her department but I think Novak mentioned it in his initial "controversial" article.
14
posted on
08/03/2005 10:14:12 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: STARWISE
I sure am glad that we have Porter Goss in there fumigating the CIA. It appears to have been heavily infested with 'RATS.
15
posted on
08/03/2005 10:19:10 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: STARWISE
It would be helpful to know if the 2001 incident occurred prior to 9/11. Anyways, I still disagree with the Bill Mahr poistion that when the terrorists actuually nuke New York City, THEN we should go after them.
To: okie01
....paperwork is busy work......making good....'paper dolls'.....take lots of time......
/copy 'machines'.....brought the 'Wall' down.......$$$$$$....???
....too much paperwork.....for me,....good night.
:-(
18
posted on
08/03/2005 10:26:26 PM PDT
by
maestro
To: piasa; okie01
Identified only by the alias "Doe," the former agent who worked as a Near Eastern specialist on counter-proliferation issues accuses the CIA of improper action on two separate pieces of intelligence.I wonder if that means he was in the same Near Eastern office as Baer et al or in the same Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and Arms Control Center (Winpac) office as Foley. I'm thinking the latter from the description, but I'm not sure on that.
19
posted on
08/03/2005 10:39:48 PM PDT
by
Fedora
To: STARWISE
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A fired CIA agent, who a newspaper says told " WHOM! Not who. Even in the swamps we know the difference between who and whom.
20
posted on
08/03/2005 10:44:58 PM PDT
by
bayourod
(Winning elections is the only thing. Those who glorify losing are unclear on the subject of democrac)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson