[Enchante]

"One was the WMD intelligence the former agent says he was asked to change in 2000"

It will be interesting to see whether there's anything to this (if the public ever gets to know), but judging from the Wilson/Plame/Larry Johnson/Ray McGovern types who have been on a crusade, it's more likely the agent was one of that crowd and is squeezing more sour grapes. Note that the date of the first issue is 2000, when the Stainmeister was still president, so watch how the presstitutes will write all their stories as though this is something the BUSH administration did to a poor downtrodden whistleblower...... Still, I suspect that a lot of debates within the intel community can be grossly distorted, e.g., any piece of intel that might SEEM to indicate Iraq had abandoned its nuclear or other WMD program might also be seen as disinformation from the Iraqi regime. Let's remember (the media won't) that Saddam and his cronies learned from KGB masters of disinformation, so any CIA analyst who too easily regards as credible a piece of intel which tells a story Saddam wants told may be a dupe......

[STARWISE]

Crazy thought: it's almost like they're giving Sadaam
pointers for his trial!! "See? I didn't have no WMD."

[Lancey Howard]

Note that the date of the first issue is 2000, when the Stainmeister was still president

Yep. The New York Times will surely never connect those dots for public consumption.

[Irish Eyes]

I am very surprised that they actually printed the date, instead of leaving it out of the story.

[Alia]

Note that the date of the first issue is 2000, when the

Bookmark

[Grampa Dave]

Excellent summary and theory on the negative impact of these anti America liberals in the agency.

[Homer1]

conspiracy theory time

The whole WMD issue was cooked up to give Clinton stuff to bomb during impeachment.