Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why John Bolton Terrifies the Liberal Democrats
NoDNC.com ^ | August 1, 2005

Posted on 08/01/2005 6:47:06 PM PDT by woodb01

Why John Bolton Terrifies the Liberal Democrats
Week of August 1, 2005
NoDNC.com staff

Let's clear up definitions first, just so that we're all on the same page and with these definitions in mind, we'll deal with the terrible horrors of John Bolton, and why he seems to positively evil to the liberal democrats.

Liberal Democrat

Saying "liberal democrat" is an oxymoron--, there is no such thing. It is kind of like saying "jumbo shrimp," it sounds tasty, but if you stop and think about it, it is just silly. It is just as silly to say "liberal democrat," if you are left of the left you are simply a hardcore socialist.

Socialist

At its most basic, socialism is another name for the belief that government is god. In socialism (and its dear brothers National Socialism, communism, and fascism) government is the source of all power and of all sustenance and life. If the socialist god of government says you die, then, you die. Remember Terri Shiavo?  Or what about partial birth abortion?  Just like with Hitler and the gas chambers, Stalin-Lenin and the gulags, China and the "re-education camps," and the list goes on. I digress but you get the picture, whether you are a "choice" supporter or not, under socialism it is government that defines whether or not life is important.

Bolton as Ambassador to the U.N.

The United Nations is the world's pre-eminent socialist organization. It exists solely, exclusively, completely and totally for the centralization of global government power and for no other reason. Its entire purpose is to create a collectivist government body to control the world's governments. And how dare the United States defy their mandate to submit its sovereignty to the jurisdiction of the "International Criminal Court." 

Why is John Bolton so scary to the "Liberal Democrats?"

Mr. Bolton's mistake, horror of horrors, is that he is gone on record as believing the United Nations needs real investigations into its corruption. The "liberal democrat" god is being challenged! By all the socialist gods, they are not going to sit still for that! 

Mr. Bolton made the fatal mistake of believing the corruption in a government body should be investigated and cleaned up. What a novel concept that is frightening to this little god's worshippers. How very sad that the "liberal democrats" attack Mr. Bolton for doing what any conscientious, red-blooded, patriotic American should do.

I for one am thrilled that the socialists, er, I mean, the "liberal democrats" just lost another fight.


 For more background information, please see:

U.N. Moving ahead with GLOBAL TAX to support Socialist Agenda
Gulag: Understanding the Magnitude of What Happened
Communism's 100 Million Victims
Communists Run Anti-War Movement in America
Exploring the Culture War in America
Mulitculturalism and Marxism


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bolton; fearfuldems; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 08/01/2005 6:47:09 PM PDT by woodb01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: woodb01

Personally, I don't think that Bolton can fix the UN. But he sure will make a lot of liberals mad, and that's worth the price of admission in itself.


2 posted on 08/01/2005 6:54:32 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I don't want Bolton to fix the UN. I want Bolton to torment the UN and everyone associated with it unceasingly.


3 posted on 08/01/2005 6:56:22 PM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woodb01

I sure was proud of my President this morning as I watched him turn Bolton loose on that corrupt,sleazy U.N. Let the fruitcakes in the Senate whine and moan. Nobody cares. No one in their right mind has any respect for that whorehouse anyway. The Senate is a waste of taxpayer dollars that needs to be shut down. We've got the House of Representatives. The Senate is just a place where we warehouse old Congressmen once they've become senile.


4 posted on 08/01/2005 7:00:34 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modok

I want Bolton to begin disbanding the UN.


5 posted on 08/01/2005 7:02:16 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

Absolutly and the very idea of the UN must be shown to be the septic sore that it is and destroyed too.


6 posted on 08/01/2005 7:06:27 PM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: woodb01

Because he has a pair of a hairy boyz?


7 posted on 08/01/2005 7:07:11 PM PDT by 359Henrie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

> ... I don't think that Bolton can fix the UN.

He certainly will put a stop to any further US tolerance
of and contribution to the festering corruption. Imagine
if a Clinton had been given the job.

Bolton may just be a stopgap until NATO is redeployed as
the GDA (Global Democratic Alliance), replacing the UN
(and having zero seats for thugs).


8 posted on 08/01/2005 7:08:58 PM PDT by Boundless (US in UN: Defund. Depart. Deport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The 17th Amendment needs to be repealed.


9 posted on 08/01/2005 7:10:39 PM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: woodb01

If the left considers the U.N. the last best hope for this country, things are looking up. If conservatives reform or demolish the U.N., they can take back the universities next.


10 posted on 08/01/2005 7:11:24 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

No thanks.


11 posted on 08/01/2005 7:11:45 PM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: woodb01
Image hosted by Photobucket.comlets see, let me count the ways... he's White, Male and Conservative, do i REALLY need to go on???
12 posted on 08/01/2005 7:19:14 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Somehow the thought of The House of Representatives being in charge of the whole legislative process scares the hell out me. I'd prefer that we Roto-Rooter the current Senate lineup and get a fresh batch of non-senile Senators. </Dreamstate>
13 posted on 08/01/2005 7:23:29 PM PDT by Sterlis (My brain is full.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
I want Bolton to begin disbanding the UN.

Bingo!

14 posted on 08/01/2005 7:50:37 PM PDT by apackof2 (In my simple way, I guess you could say I'm living in the BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: woodb01

Time for "GOPs Extreme UN Makeover staring Tye Bolton"


15 posted on 08/01/2005 7:56:43 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodb01

Another one of those inane read meat screeds - pretty embarrassing.


16 posted on 08/01/2005 7:58:19 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
I want Bolton to begin disbanding the UN.

Agreed!

If a tree fell in the forest and there was nobody there to hear it, did it make any sound?

If the UN was disbanded, would anybody notice?

At the risk of angering the liberals more than they currently are with the Bolton assignment (which is exactly why I will make the following statement), the U.S. is the one unifying power in the world and the policeman of the world. No UN needed since we, the U.S. is already doing the UN's job.
17 posted on 08/01/2005 8:02:36 PM PDT by adorno (The democrats are the best recruiting tool the terrorists could ever have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Modok

> No thanks.

Presumably in response to my speculation about a replacement
for the UN.

I don't think we need one either. Both the League of Nations
and the UN not only failed to prevent wars, they probably
enabled them.

But unfortunately, I suspect Bush does think such
organizations can be useful, even necessary.


18 posted on 08/01/2005 8:03:55 PM PDT by Boundless (US in UN: Defund. Depart. Deport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: adorno

No, we are not.
And frankly, I don't give a damn about the rest of the world.Why should I? Mostly, the rest of the world is ruled by thuggishly ignorant despots.
OTOH, neither does the actual UN, as presently constituited.
The UN deserves the same fate as the League of Nations.
Perhaps the third incarnation will work, but the present structure has failed, and must end.


19 posted on 08/01/2005 8:15:56 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Modok
The 17th Amendment needs to be repealed.

Glad you said that! 17th Amendment provides for popular election of US senators instead of the original construction of having state assemblies appoint them. I remember Antonin Scalia pointing this out as a mistake in a speech he gave years ago. The showboating and histrionics would have no audience among politicians back at the state capitals, so it would disappear.

20 posted on 08/01/2005 8:30:08 PM PDT by AlienCrossfirePlayer (Missouri Gov. Matt Blunt for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson