lets see, let me count the ways... he's White, Male and Conservative, do i REALLY need to go on???
Posted on 08/01/2005 6:47:06 PM PDT by woodb01
Personally, I don't think that Bolton can fix the UN. But he sure will make a lot of liberals mad, and that's worth the price of admission in itself.
I don't want Bolton to fix the UN. I want Bolton to torment the UN and everyone associated with it unceasingly.
I sure was proud of my President this morning as I watched him turn Bolton loose on that corrupt,sleazy U.N. Let the fruitcakes in the Senate whine and moan. Nobody cares. No one in their right mind has any respect for that whorehouse anyway. The Senate is a waste of taxpayer dollars that needs to be shut down. We've got the House of Representatives. The Senate is just a place where we warehouse old Congressmen once they've become senile.
I want Bolton to begin disbanding the UN.
Absolutly and the very idea of the UN must be shown to be the septic sore that it is and destroyed too.
Because he has a pair of a hairy boyz?
> ... I don't think that Bolton can fix the UN.
He certainly will put a stop to any further US tolerance
of and contribution to the festering corruption. Imagine
if a Clinton had been given the job.
Bolton may just be a stopgap until NATO is redeployed as
the GDA (Global Democratic Alliance), replacing the UN
(and having zero seats for thugs).
The 17th Amendment needs to be repealed.
If the left considers the U.N. the last best hope for this country, things are looking up. If conservatives reform or demolish the U.N., they can take back the universities next.
No thanks.
lets see, let me count the ways... he's White, Male and Conservative, do i REALLY need to go on???
Bingo!
Time for "GOPs Extreme UN Makeover staring Tye Bolton"
Another one of those inane read meat screeds - pretty embarrassing.
> No thanks.
Presumably in response to my speculation about a replacement
for the UN.
I don't think we need one either. Both the League of Nations
and the UN not only failed to prevent wars, they probably
enabled them.
But unfortunately, I suspect Bush does think such
organizations can be useful, even necessary.
No, we are not.
And frankly, I don't give a damn about the rest of the world.Why should I? Mostly, the rest of the world is ruled by thuggishly ignorant despots.
OTOH, neither does the actual UN, as presently constituited.
The UN deserves the same fate as the League of Nations.
Perhaps the third incarnation will work, but the present structure has failed, and must end.
Glad you said that! 17th Amendment provides for popular election of US senators instead of the original construction of having state assemblies appoint them. I remember Antonin Scalia pointing this out as a mistake in a speech he gave years ago. The showboating and histrionics would have no audience among politicians back at the state capitals, so it would disappear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.