Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could Judy Miller Have Been the White House’s Source?
National Review ^ | August 1, 2005 | Clifford D. May

Posted on 08/01/2005 1:18:02 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Yardstick

Fitzgerald's investigation is supposed to be wrapped up in October.


41 posted on 08/01/2005 4:26:29 PM PDT by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NEPA

And Novak will spill the beans right after the investigation ends...should be a fun October!


42 posted on 08/01/2005 4:28:58 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

That is why she is sitting in jail...she will get time served from the Grand Jury, while trying to make some sort of statement.


43 posted on 08/01/2005 4:32:22 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff
This is getting ready to blow up in the Dems faces. I can smell it.

No way! Don't you pay attention? I mean, look at how the impeachment of Bush will occur as a result of:

We have much to fear ;)

44 posted on 08/01/2005 4:38:03 PM PDT by Shazbot29 (If you paid attention you'd be worried, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
So is the scenario: Plame told Miller, Miller told Libby, Libby told Rove and Novak, and Rove told Cooper? And Joe Wilson told everyone else? lol

These circular confirmations is what has been bugging me about the whole affair. From what I gather from Cooper's report, he told Libby something, Libby may have have told something to Rove, Cooper told Rove who replied "Yeah, I heard that," referring to what Cooper told Libby, and then Novak said something and Rove or Libby said "Oh, you heard about that, too?"

It seems that floating a rumor to one person who repeats it to a second person who confirms hearing it to the person who started it is what passes for confirmation theses days in the MSM.

-PJ

45 posted on 08/01/2005 5:03:42 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NEPA

Thank you.


46 posted on 08/01/2005 5:40:04 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I believe the inference was in his original article if you can get a copy of it.


47 posted on 08/01/2005 5:44:36 PM PDT by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 4integrity

>> 'She (Miller)is protecting some Dem or someone on the NYT'

> Bingo...my bet would be on a big time Dim. If it was
> Rove, she'd have sung like a canary.

Particularly since Rove gave her the same blanket waiver
he gave Cooper, and Cooper has already blabbed what he
recalled of his conversations with Rove.

Of course, Miller could also be protecting herself. If
she had been [provably] warned about the undercover
status by anyone, dug up the name, and pubbed it, she
might be the smoking gun. Seems an unlikely scenario,
tho, as it's pretty clear that the law in question
didn't actually apply to Plame at the time.

So why is there still an investigation? Perhaps it's
morphed into a Stewart scenario, and is now just about
someone lying to investigators.


48 posted on 08/01/2005 6:03:06 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
This Boomerang is heading back to the Wilsons!! Can you say perjury???

Pray for W and Our Ground Pounders

49 posted on 08/01/2005 6:05:18 PM PDT by bray (Pray for the Freedom of the Iraqis from Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

LOL! Any time Huffington makes sense, I know I have entered the Twilight Zone.


50 posted on 08/01/2005 6:44:13 PM PDT by ladyinred (Here come the judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
I have read an exhaustive report of this whole thing and Judith Miller is not in jail for the Valerie Plame thing.
She is in jail for refusing to name sources for another story entirely unrelated to the Plame Affair.
I believe this was in the Wall Street Journal last week. So check it out. Seems Fitzgerald is also investigating things not entirely related to the Plame Affair.
51 posted on 08/01/2005 6:48:24 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Just finished a great novel, "By Order of the President" by W. E. B. Griffin. One of the characters, a female CIA agent, is an ambitious, deceitful, physically attractive married woman. Her husband, another CIA agent assigned in Washington, is rumored to be gay. It it is obvious that the marriage is cosmetic only, since she promptly seduces the book's hero, telling him the she and her husband have "an understanding". I don't know why, but the name Valerie Plame popped into my mind when I read this section of the book.


52 posted on 08/02/2005 7:25:03 AM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Glad that Ted the Boorish Drunk, Hitlery the Witch and John Fonda/Fraud Kerry are not my senators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson