Posted on 08/01/2005 1:18:02 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
Here's a sentence I never thought I'd write: Arianna Huffington has a point.
She reports in the July 27 edition of "The Huffington Post" that in the halls of the New York Times, among the colleagues of imprisoned reporter Judy Miller, a theory is being debated. It boils down to this: Perhaps after Joseph Wilson's notorious op-ed appeared in the Times, Judy called a source (or two) in the intelligence community to find out how and why Wilson was sent by the CIA to Niger to investigate whether Saddam Hussein had sought to purchase uranium.
Perhaps her source(s) told her that Wilson got the assignment thanks to his wife, Valerie Plame, who works at CIA HQ in Langley.
Now further suppose that Miller is trying to develop this into a larger story on Wilson and the controversy over the Bush administration's arguments for regime change in Iraq. So she calls people in the White House, Karl Rove, maybe, or Dick Cheney deputy Scooter Libby or someone. (Newsday identified a meeting Miller had on July 8 — two days after Wilson's op-ed appeared, with an "unnamed" government official.)
Judy perhaps says: "My sources tell me that Wilson's wife works at the CIA and that she was the one who recommended that he get the Africa assignment. How does that square with Wilson's claim that Cheney sent him to Niger, and that Cheney received his report and ignored it?"
At this point, whoever in the White House Miller talked with would know about Plame — but not based on their access to classified information.
And he (or she or they) still would not necessarily know that Plame had some sort of undercover status. Judy's source(s) might not have told her that. Indeed, the source(s) might not have known. The source(s) may have become acquainted with Plame at CIA HQ in Langley. Presumably, Plame would not have told such colleagues that she occasionally worked undercover. They'd have no "need to know."
Rove, Libby, or others might have passed on what they learned from Judy to Bob Novak or Matt Cooper or other reporters. Why not? They'd want to tell the truth, to rebut Wilson's false spin that Cheney had sent him to Africa and then had ignored his conclusive report.
They would not be revealing to reporters any facts derived from their access to classified information. And they still wouldn't have any idea they were discussing a CIA secret (or sometimes-sort-of-secret) agent rather than a run-of-the-mill agency analyst.
If this is close to what happened, it would explain why Judy would not feel free to testify before a grand jury. Were she to do so, she'd get her source(s) fired, and probably prosecuted. Reporters don't like to do that.
It also would explain why independent prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is keeping Miller in the slammer. If it were she who first told someone in the White House (who no doubt told others in the White House) about Plame, her testimony would be the key that solves the puzzle. In fact, without that key, it might be impossible for Fitzgerald to solve the puzzle.
There is much else in the Huffington post that is purely speculative and she also manages to throw plenty of mud at Rove and others — including Judy Miller whom Huffington accuses of having pushed "manipulated, twisted, and exaggerated intel in the Times."
But Huffington's basic point is perceptive (another sentence I never thought I'd write): Miller may not want to reveal her "source" at the White House "because she was the source....In this scenario Miller wasn't an innocent writer caught up in the whirl of history. She had a starring role in it."
Yep, they are getting so nervous their "depends" are starting to fail. Is that what you smell?
Something like that... Yes.
> If this is close to what happened, it would explain why
> Judy would not feel free to testify before a grand jury.
> Were she to do so, she'd get her source(s) fired, and
> probably prosecuted. Reporters don't like to do that.
That gives this NYT hack way too much credit.
If she could obtain a get-out-of-jail-free card at
the cost of some WH staffer's job, it would have been
done 5 minutes before booking into the slammer.
She's protecting either someone on the NYT and/or
some Democrat, and/or Wilson himself.
RE: "This has to be the biggest non-story of the century, discounting Whoraldo's uncovering Al Capone's treasure."
Technically, Al Capone's treasure was the previous century, so Plame's outing still is the biggest non-story of this century. ;-)
Thanks, these centuries fly by so quickly anymore.
IIRC, Cheney never read "the report" because Wilson's "report" was an Op-Ed in the NYT.
I think you are right....after reading Novaks column today....Mt. Bob is going to blow.....and its going to be fun to watch.
Yup.
Novak seems to be itching for the indictments to be handed down, whereas Russert, Cooper, et al all seem like they're hiding something.
Cheney said he never saw a report by Wilson, and what's more, Wilson said he never WROTE a report!!
I have been saying this for weeks on Free Republic. Judy Miller covered WMD's for the NYT and wrote a best selling book on the subject. Where would she get her info from besides the internet? The CIA. She has had a long relationship with the CIA and was in Iraq with the group looking for WMD's after the fall of Baghdad. Since Plame worked on WMD issues at the Agency, it makes total sense for Miller & Plame to know each other. I'm sure Miller also knew Plame before 1998 when she was Valerie Plame, not Valerie Wilson.
Since Joe Wilson wrote in the NYT's that Cheney had sent him to Niger, who would Miller call about the subject? She called the VP's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libbey to ask him about it.
What did Scooter Libbey tell the Grand Jury? He testified that he was told about Valerie "Plame" by a journalist.
NYT's Judith Miller is the CIA so-called "Leaker"....AND the prosecutor knows it because it has been quoted in the press that he said "your honor, I don't know why she won't testify, because we know who her source is". She is going to be charged with criminal contempt and obstruction of justice if she doesn't talk. Remember what I have said. It's going to happen and her liberal media allies are going to go berserk and I want a front row seat! HeeHee
Whoa! The prosecutor said this?
So is the scenario: Plame told Miller, Miller told Libby, Libby told Rove and Novak, and Rove told Cooper? And Joe Wilson told everyone else? lol
More like Plame told Miller, Miller told everyone and Wilson lied his ass off.
'She (Miller)is protecting some Dem or someone on the NYT'
Bingo...my bet would be on a big time Dim. If it was Rove, she'd have sung like a canary.
When is Fitzgerald's investigation expected to be completed? And will the results be made public?
I can't wait to see what's been discovered. I also look forward to hearing what Bob Novak has to say. He's got a lot of stuff bottled up, just waiting to come out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.