Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boundless

'She (Miller)is protecting some Dem or someone on the NYT'

Bingo...my bet would be on a big time Dim. If it was Rove, she'd have sung like a canary.


37 posted on 08/01/2005 3:00:59 PM PDT by 4integrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: 4integrity

>> 'She (Miller)is protecting some Dem or someone on the NYT'

> Bingo...my bet would be on a big time Dim. If it was
> Rove, she'd have sung like a canary.

Particularly since Rove gave her the same blanket waiver
he gave Cooper, and Cooper has already blabbed what he
recalled of his conversations with Rove.

Of course, Miller could also be protecting herself. If
she had been [provably] warned about the undercover
status by anyone, dug up the name, and pubbed it, she
might be the smoking gun. Seems an unlikely scenario,
tho, as it's pretty clear that the law in question
didn't actually apply to Plame at the time.

So why is there still an investigation? Perhaps it's
morphed into a Stewart scenario, and is now just about
someone lying to investigators.


48 posted on 08/01/2005 6:03:06 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson